» Articles » PMID: 21673663

Ultrasonic Frogs Show Extraordinary Sex Differences in Auditory Frequency Sensitivity

Overview
Journal Nat Commun
Specialty Biology
Date 2011 Jun 16
PMID 21673663
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Acoustic communication has an important role in the reproductive behaviour of anurans. Although males of the concave-eared frog (Odorrana tormota) have shown an ultrasonic communication capacity adapted to the intense, predominately low-frequency ambient noise from local streams, whether the females communicate with ultrasound remains unclear. Here we present evidence that females exhibit no ultrasonic sensitivity. Acoustic playback experiments show that the calls from male evoke phonotaxis and vocal responses from gravid females, whereas the ultrasonic components (frequencies above 20 kHz) of the calls do not elicit any phonotaxis or vocalization in the females. Electrophysiological recordings from the auditory midbrain reveal an upper frequency limit at 16 kHz in females. Laser Doppler vibrometer measurements show that the velocity amplitude of the tympanic membranes peaks at 5 kHz in females and at ∼7 kHz in males. The auditory sex differences in O. tormota imply that ultrasonic hearing has evolved only in male anurans.

Citing Articles

A new sexual selection pattern in a frog () with ultrasonic communication.

Liu G, Pan S, Shi Q, Lei Z, Wu J, Zhang H Proc Biol Sci. 2025; 292(2039):20242139.

PMID: 39837520 PMC: 11750359. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2139.


Vocalization-induced middle ear muscle reflex and auditory fovea do not contribute to the unimpaired auditory sensitivity after intense noise exposure in the CF-FM bat, Hipposideros pratti.

Cui Z, Zou J, Zhou Y, Cao Y, Song H, Xu H J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2024; 211(1):53-67.

PMID: 39212726 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-024-01714-5.


Peripheral hearing sensitivity is similar between the sexes in a benthic turtle species despite the larger body size of males.

Wang T, Yang J, Lei J, Huang J, Shi H, Wang J Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(8):e70130.

PMID: 39130099 PMC: 11310098. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70130.


Frequency jumps and subharmonic components in calls of female Odorrana tormota differentially affect the vocal behaviors of male frogs.

Wu Y, Luo X, Chen P, Zhang F Front Zool. 2023; 20(1):39.

PMID: 38062453 PMC: 10704646. DOI: 10.1186/s12983-023-00517-9.


Hidden shifts in allometry scaling between sound production and perception in anurans.

Maria B, Tonini J, Reboucas R, Toledo L PeerJ. 2023; 11:e16322.

PMID: 37941929 PMC: 10629387. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16322.


References
1.
Wilczynski W, Ryan M . Call patterns and basilar papilla tuning in cricket frogs. II. Intrapopulation variation and allometry. Brain Behav Evol. 1992; 39(4):238-46. DOI: 10.1159/000114121. View

2.
Shen J, Feng A, Xu Z, Yu Z, Arch V, Yu X . Ultrasonic frogs show hyperacute phonotaxis to female courtship calls. Nature. 2008; 453(7197):914-6. DOI: 10.1038/nature06719. View

3.
Miranda J, Wilczynski W . Sex differences and androgen influences on midbrain auditory thresholds in the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea. Hear Res. 2009; 252(1-2):79-88. PMC: 2698038. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.04.004. View

4.
Mason M, Lin C, Narins P . Sex differences in the middle ear of the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana). Brain Behav Evol. 2003; 61(2):91-101. DOI: 10.1159/000069354. View

5.
Hetherington T . Sexual differences in the tympanic frequency responses of the American bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana). J Acoust Soc Am. 1994; 96(2 Pt 1):1186-8. DOI: 10.1121/1.410326. View