Epigenetic Restriction of Extraembryonic Lineages Mirrors the Somatic Transition to Cancer
Authors
Affiliations
In mammals, the canonical somatic DNA methylation landscape is established upon specification of the embryo proper and subsequently disrupted within many cancer types. However, the underlying mechanisms that direct this genome-scale transformation remain elusive, with no clear model for its systematic acquisition or potential developmental utility. Here, we analysed global remethylation from the mouse preimplantation embryo into the early epiblast and extraembryonic ectoderm. We show that these two states acquire highly divergent genomic distributions with substantial disruption of bimodal, CpG density-dependent methylation in the placental progenitor. The extraembryonic epigenome includes specific de novo methylation at hundreds of embryonically protected CpG island promoters, particularly those that are associated with key developmental regulators and are orthologously methylated across most human cancer types. Our data suggest that the evolutionary innovation of extraembryonic tissues may have required co-option of DNA methylation-based suppression as an alternative to regulation by Polycomb-group proteins, which coordinate embryonic germ-layer formation in response to extraembryonic cues. Moreover, we establish that this decision is made deterministically, downstream of promiscuously used-and frequently oncogenic-signalling pathways, via a novel combination of epigenetic cofactors. Methylation of developmental gene promoters during tumorigenesis may therefore reflect the misappropriation of an innate trajectory and the spontaneous reacquisition of a latent, developmentally encoded epigenetic landscape.
Gestational trophoblastic disease: understanding the molecular mechanisms of placental tumours.
Nicheperovich A, Schuster-Bockler B, Ni Leathlobhair M Dis Model Mech. 2025; 18(1).
PMID: 39873178 PMC: 11810044. DOI: 10.1242/dmm.052010.
Origin, fate and function of extraembryonic tissues during mammalian development.
Thowfeequ S, Hanna C, Srinivas S Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2024; .
PMID: 39627419 DOI: 10.1038/s41580-024-00809-w.
Xu Z, Shi J, Chen Q, Yang S, Wang Z, Xiao B J Biol Chem. 2024; 301(1):107990.
PMID: 39542247 PMC: 11742614. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107990.
Stepwise de novo establishment of inactive X chromosome architecture in early development.
Du Z, Hu L, Zou Z, Liu M, Li Z, Lu X Nat Genet. 2024; 56(10):2185-2198.
PMID: 39256583 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-024-01897-2.
Transcription of Endogenous Retroviruses: Broad and Precise Mechanisms of Control.
Jarosz A, Halo J Viruses. 2024; 16(8).
PMID: 39205286 PMC: 11359688. DOI: 10.3390/v16081312.