» Articles » PMID: 28941158

Prognostic and Predictive Role of [ F]fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) in Patients with Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) Treated with Up-front Pemetrexed-based Chemotherapy

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of metabolic parameters analyzed at baseline and at interim FDG-PET in predicting disease outcome in unresectable MPM patients receiving pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. A consecutive series of MPM patients treated between February 2004 and July 2013 with first-line pemetrexed-based chemotherapy, and evaluated by FDG-PET and CT scan at baseline and after two cycles of chemotherapy, was reviewed. Best CT scan response was assessed according to modified RECIST criteria. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were correlated with FDG-PET parameters, such as maximum standardized uptake value (SUV ), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and percentage changes in SUV (∆SUV) and TLG (∆TLG). Overall, 142 patients were enrolled; 77 (54%) received talc pleurodesis before chemotherapy. Baseline SUV and TLG showed a statistically significant correlation with PFS and OS (P < 0.05) in both group of patients (treated and untreated with pleurodesis). In 65 patients not receiving pleurodesis, SUV reduction ≥25% (∆SUV ≥ 25%) and TLG reduction ≥30% (∆TLG ≥ 30%) were significantly associated with longer PFS (P < 0.05). Patients showing both ∆SUV ≥ 25% and ∆TLG ≥ 30% responses had a significant reduction in the risk of disease progression (HR:0.31, P < 0.001) and death (HR:0.52, P = 0.044). Neither ∆SUV nor ∆TLG showed similar association with survival outcomes in patients treated with pleurodesis. Our study confirmed the prognostic role of baseline FDG-PET in a large series of MPM patients treated with first-line pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. Moreover, use of ∆SUV ≥ 25% and ∆TLG ≥ 30% as cut-off values to define early metabolic response supported the role of FDG-PET in predicting disease outcome and treatment response in patients not receiving pleurodesis.

Citing Articles

The Prognostic Value of F-FDG PET Imaging at Staging in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Literature Review.

Taralli S, Giancipoli R, Caldarella C, Scolozzi V, Ricciardi S, Cardillo G J Clin Med. 2022; 11(1).

PMID: 35011772 PMC: 8745748. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11010033.


The prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/ computed tomography parameters in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Yenigun B, Kahya Y, Soydal C, Ata Tutkun N, Kocaman G, Kocak E Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2021; 29(1):92-100.

PMID: 33768986 PMC: 7970077. DOI: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2021.20432.


Predicting tumor response and outcome of second-look surgery with F-FDG PET/CT: insights from the GINECO CHIVA phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus nintedanib in stage IIIc-IV FIGO ovarian cancer.

Aide N, Fauchille P, Coquan E, Ferron G, Combe P, Meunier J Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020; 48(6):1998-2008.

PMID: 33221969 PMC: 8113167. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05092-3.


Does size matter? -a population-based analysis of malignant pleural mesothelioma.

He J, Xu S, Pan H, Li S, He J Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2020; 9(4):1041-1052.

PMID: 32953483 PMC: 7481612. DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-19-488.


PET/CT-Based Response Evaluation in Cancer-a Systematic Review of Design Issues.

Gerke O, Ehlers K, Motschall E, Hoilund-Carlsen P, Vach W Mol Imaging Biol. 2019; 22(1):33-46.

PMID: 31016638 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-019-01351-4.


References
1.
Schaefer N, Veit-Haibach P, Soyka J, Steinert H, Stahel R . Continued pemetrexed and platin-based chemotherapy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM): value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT. Eur J Radiol. 2010; 81(1):e19-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.11.006. View

2.
Young H, Baum R, Cremerius U, Herholz K, Hoekstra O, Lammertsma A . Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. Eur J Cancer. 2000; 35(13):1773-82. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(99)00229-4. View

3.
Klabatsa A, Chicklore S, Barrington S, Goh V, Lang-Lazdunski L, Cook G . The association of 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters with survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013; 41(2):276-82. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-013-2561-1. View

4.
Genestreti G, Moretti A, Piciucchi S, Giovannini N, Galassi R, Scarpi E . FDG PET/CT Response Evaluation in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Patients Treated with Talc Pleurodesis and Chemotherapy. J Cancer. 2012; 3:241-5. PMC: 3366479. DOI: 10.7150/jca.2586. View

5.
Armato 3rd S, Ogarek J, Starkey A, Vogelzang N, Kindler H, Kocherginsky M . Variability in mesothelioma tumor response classification. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 186(4):1000-6. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.0076. View