» Articles » PMID: 28934184

Rural and Urban Differences in Passenger-Vehicle-Occupant Deaths and Seat Belt Use Among Adults - United States, 2014

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2017 Sep 22
PMID 28934184
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Problem/condition: Motor-vehicle crashes are a leading cause of death in the United States. Compared with urban residents, rural residents are at an increased risk for death from crashes and are less likely to wear seat belts. These differences have not been well described by levels of rurality.

Reporting Period: 2014.

Description Of Systems: Data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) were used to identify passenger-vehicle-occupant deaths from motor-vehicle crashes and estimate the prevalence of seat belt use. FARS, a census of U.S. motor-vehicle crashes involving one or more deaths, was used to identify passenger-vehicle-occupant deaths among adults aged ≥18 years. Passenger-vehicle occupants were defined as persons driving or riding in passenger cars, light trucks, vans, or sport utility vehicles. Death rates per 100,000 population, age-adjusted to the 2000 U.S. standard population and the proportion of occupants who were unrestrained at the time of the fatal crash, were calculated. BRFSS, an annual, state-based, random-digit-dialed telephone survey of the noninstitutionalized U.S. civilian population aged ≥18 years, was used to estimate prevalence of seat belt use. FARS and BRFSS data were analyzed by a six-level rural-urban designation, based on the U.S. Department of Agriculture 2013 rural-urban continuum codes, and stratified by census region and type of state seat belt enforcement law (primary or secondary).

Results: Within each census region, age-adjusted passenger-vehicle-occupant death rates per 100,000 population increased with increasing rurality, from the most urban to the most rural counties: South, 6.8 to 29.2; Midwest, 5.3 to 25.8; West, 3.9 to 40.0; and Northeast, 3.5 to 10.8. (For the Northeast, data for the most rural counties were not reported because of suppression criteria; comparison is for the most urban to the second-most rural counties.) Similarly, the proportion of occupants who were unrestrained at the time of the fatal crash increased as rurality increased. Self-reported seat belt use in the United States decreased with increasing rurality, ranging from 88.8% in the most urban counties to 74.7% in the most rural counties. Similar differences in age-adjusted death rates and seat belt use were observed in states with primary and secondary seat belt enforcement laws.

Interpretation: Rurality was associated with higher age-adjusted passenger-vehicle-occupant death rates, a higher proportion of unrestrained passenger-vehicle-occupant deaths, and lower seat belt use among adults in all census regions and regardless of state seat belt enforcement type.

Public Health Actions: Seat belt use decreases and age-adjusted passenger-vehicle-occupant death rates increase with increasing levels of rurality. Improving seat belt use remains a critical strategy to reduce crash-related deaths in the United States, especially in rural areas where seat belt use is lower and age-adjusted death rates are higher than in urban areas. States and communities can consider using evidence-based interventions to reduce rural-urban disparities in seat belt use and passenger-vehicle-occupant death rates.

Citing Articles

Seat belt use among rural non-drivers: the role of demographic and traffic-related variables.

Sadeghi-Bazargani H, Malekpour F, Mohammadian Y, Jafari-Koshki T, Rezapur-Shahkolai F, Khansari M J Inj Violence Res. 2024; 16(1).

PMID: 38343380 PMC: 11684844. DOI: 10.5249/jivr.v16i1.1852.


Rural health and rural industries: Opportunities for partnership and action.

Scott K, Elliott K, Lincoln J, Flynn M, Hill R, Hall D J Rural Health. 2023; 40(2):401-405.

PMID: 37669228 PMC: 10912364. DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12791.


The prevalence of seat belt use among drivers and passengers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kargar S, Ansari-Moghaddam A, Ansari H J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2023; 98(1):14.

PMID: 37528241 PMC: 10393920. DOI: 10.1186/s42506-023-00139-3.


Modeling road traffic fatalities in Iran's six most populous provinces, 2015-2016.

Jahanjoo F, Sadeghi-Bazargani H, Asghari-Jafarabadi M BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):2234.

PMID: 36451170 PMC: 9710022. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14678-5.


Examining rural-urban disparities in perceived need for health care services among adults with disabilities.

Gimm G, Ipsen C Front Rehabil Sci. 2022; 3:875978.

PMID: 36188990 PMC: 9397972. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2022.875978.


References
1.
Sleet D, Shults R, Zaza S, Elder R, Nichols J, Thompson R . Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to increase the use of safety belts. Am J Prev Med. 2001; 21(4 Suppl):48-65. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00378-6. View

2.
Li G, Braver E, Chen L . Fragility versus excessive crash involvement as determinants of high death rates per vehicle-mile of travel among older drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2002; 35(2):227-35. DOI: 10.1016/s0001-4575(01)00107-5. View

3.
Melton S, McGwin Jr G, Abernathy 3rd J, MacLennan P, Cross J, Rue 3rd L . Motor vehicle crash-related mortality is associated with prehospital and hospital-based resource availability. J Trauma. 2003; 54(2):273-9; discussion 279. DOI: 10.1097/01.TA.0000038506.54819.11. View

4.
Zwerling C, Peek-Asa C, Whitten P, Choi S, Sprince N, Jones M . Fatal motor vehicle crashes in rural and urban areas: decomposing rates into contributing factors. Inj Prev. 2005; 11(1):24-8. PMC: 1730169. DOI: 10.1136/ip.2004.005959. View

5.
Ball C, Kirkpatrick A, Brenneman F . Noncompliance with seat-belt use in patients involved in motor vehicle collisions. Can J Surg. 2005; 48(5):367-72. PMC: 3211890. View