Use of Seat Belts Among Public Transport Drivers in Tacna, Peru: Prevalence and Risk Factors

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2021 May 18

PMID 34003872

Authors

Armando Minan-Tapia

Gloria S Torres-Riveros

Jose Choque-Vargas

Madeleyni Aycachi-Incacona

Neil Flores-Valdez

Orlando Vargas-Anahua

Christian R Mejia

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: There are individuals who still refuse to wear seat belts, despite its effectiveness in reducing morbidity and mortality in road traffic accidents. We aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors according to the use of seat belts among public transport drivers in Tacna, Peru.

Methodology: This analytical transversal study was carried out among public transport drivers (buses and taxis) in a Peruvian city. Questionnaires were used to evaluate the general and occupational characteristics and the use of seat belts (observed). Descriptive statistics and risk factors were obtained, these latter through generalized linear models.

Results: Of the 460 drivers, 77% used their seat belts, with a difference in use depending on the type of public transport (p<0.001). In the multivariate model, the risk of not using the belt was associated with the following: older age (p<0.001), having complete studies (p<0.001), a higher level/category of driving license (3 categories had p<0.001), having a higher number of previous road traffic accidents (p = 0.011), and received medical attention in that accident (p<0.001), those who reported using a cell phone while driving (p = 0.005), if the co-driver's belt had 3 anchorage points (p<0.001), and working for > 5 hours that day (p = 0.002). However, male drivers and those who had their belt with 3 anchorage points had greater use (both p<0.001).

Conclusions: One in five drivers did not use a seat belt, and important characteristics of those who did not comply with this traffic law were evaluated to generate control and intervention measures.

References

Lipovac K, Tesic M, Maric B, deric M . Self-reported and observed seat belt use--A case study: Bosnia and Herzegovina. Accid Anal Prev. 2015; 84:74-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.08.010. View

Lim S, Chi J . Cellphone bans and fatal motor vehicle crash rates in the United States. J Public Health Policy. 2013; 34(2):197-212. DOI: 10.1057/jphp.2013.3. View

Wong T, Lim G, Chow K, Zaw N, Van Nguyen H, Chin H . Buckling up in Singapore: residency and other risk factors for seatbelt non-compliance - a cross-sectional study based on trauma registry data. BMC Public Health. 2016; 16:402. PMC: 4867087. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3080-3. View

Freund N, Turosak A, Dean A, White H . Are we SAFE now? An evaluation of the Seatbelts Are for Everyone teen traffic safety program in Kansas. Traffic Inj Prev. 2019; 20(8):783-788. DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1657848. View

Zabihi F, Davoodi S, Nordfjaern T . The role of perceived risk, reasons for non-seat belt use and demographic characteristics for seat belt use on urban and rural roads. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2019; 26(4):431-441. DOI: 10.1080/17457300.2019.1660377. View

Novoa A, Perez K, Borrell C . [Evidence-based effectiveness of road safety interventions: a literature review]. Gac Sanit. 2009; 23(6):553.e1-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2009.04.006. View

Crandall M, Streams J, Duncan T, Mallat A, Greene W, Violano P . Motor vehicle collision-related injuries in the elderly: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma evidence-based review of risk factors and prevention. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015; 79(1):152-8. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000677. View

Shakya I, Shults R, Stevens M, Beck L, Sleet D . State-level seat belt use in the United States, 2011-2016: Comparison of self-reported with observed use and use by fatally injured occupants. J Safety Res. 2020; 73:103-109. PMC: 8091930. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.02.015. View

Conner K, Xiang H, Smith G . The impact of a standard enforcement safety belt law on fatalities and hospital charges in Ohio. J Safety Res. 2010; 41(1):17-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2009.10.005. View

10.

Fouda Mbarga N, Abubakari A, Aminde L, Morgan A . Seatbelt use and risk of major injuries sustained by vehicle occupants during motor-vehicle crashes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMC Public Health. 2018; 18(1):1413. PMC: 6310927. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-6280-1. View

11.

Beck L, Kresnow M, Bergen G . Belief about seat belt use and seat belt wearing behavior among front and rear seat passengers in the United States. J Safety Res. 2019; 68:81-88. PMC: 6422166. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2018.12.007. View

12.

Kim J, Kim S, Lee K, Kim H, Kim H, Lee S . Preventive effects of seat belts on traumatic brain injury in motor vehicle collisions classified by crash severities and collision directions. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019; 47(5):1437-1449. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-019-01095-4. View

13.

Elkbuli A, Dowd B, Spano 2nd P, Hai S, Boneva D, Mckenney M . The association between seatbelt use and trauma outcomes: Does body mass index matter?. Am J Emerg Med. 2018; 37(9):1716-1719. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.12.023. View

14.

Lorini C, Bianchi J, Sartor G, Santini M, Mersi A, Caini S . Trends in the use of seat belts and mobile phones and their seasonal variations in Florence (2005-2015). PLoS One. 2018; 13(12):e0208489. PMC: 6289414. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208489. View

15.

Mahfoud Z, Cheema S, Alrouh H, Al-Thani M, Al-Thani A, Mamtani R . Seat belt and mobile phone use among vehicle drivers in the city of Doha, Qatar: an observational study. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15:937. PMC: 4578805. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2283-3. View

16.

Amiotte J, Anne Balanay J, Humphrey C . Seat Belt Usage Interventions for Motor Vehicle Crash Prevention on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation, South Dakota. J Environ Health. 2016; 78(6):46-52. View

17.

Zeng Q, Wen H, Huang H, Pei X, Wong S . A multivariate random-parameters Tobit model for analyzing highway crash rates by injury severity. Accid Anal Prev. 2016; 99(Pt A):184-191. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.11.018. View

18.

Organizacion Panamericana de la Salud . [Evidence synthesis: guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of dengue, chikungunya, and zika in the Region of the AmericasSíntese de evidências: diretrizes para o diagnóstico e o tratamento da dengue, chikungunya e zika na Região das Américas]. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2022; 46:e82. PMC: 9299388. DOI: 10.26633/RPSP.2022.82. View

19.

Chen F, Song M, Ma X . Investigation on the Injury Severity of Drivers in Rear-End Collisions Between Cars Using a Random Parameters Bivariate Ordered Probit Model. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(14). PMC: 6678079. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16142632. View

20.

Greene W, Smith R . Driving in the Geriatric Population. Clin Geriatr Med. 2018; 35(1):127-131. DOI: 10.1016/j.cger.2018.08.011. View