The Prevalence of Seat Belt Use Among Drivers and Passengers: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview

Journal J Egypt Public Health Assoc

Publisher Springer

Specialty Public Health

Date 2023 Aug 1

PMID 37528241

Authors

Shiva Kargar

Alireza Ansari-Moghaddam

Hossein Ansari

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Seat belts might save people's lives in car accidents by preventing severe collision damage and keeping passengers safe from critical injuries. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the prevalence of seat belt use among drivers and passengers.

Methods: The databases of PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), and Google Scholar were searched from the beginning of 2000 to late December 2020 to identify studies that investigated the prevalence of seat belt use among drivers and passengers. The pooled prevalence was calculated using a random-effects model. The STATA-v14 software was used to perform data analysis.

Results: Sixty-eight studies that met the inclusion criteria and were suitable for this meta-analysis were identified. The pooled prevalence of seat belt use was 43.94% (95% CI: 42.23-45.73) among drivers, 38.47% (95% CI: 34.89-42.42) among front-seat passengers, and 15.32% (95% CI: 12.33-19.03) among rear-seat passengers. The lowest seat belt use among drivers and passengers was observed in Asia, the Middle East, and Africa, while the highest use was reported in Europe and America. Moreover, the prevalence of seat belt use was higher among women drivers [51.47% (95% CI: 48.62-54.48)] than men drivers [38.27% (95% CI: 34.98-41.87)] (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the highest prevalence of seat belt use was seen among drivers (68.9%) and front-seat passengers (50.5%) of sports utility vehicles (SUVs); in contrast, the lowest prevalence was observed among drivers and passengers of public vehicles such as buses, minibuses, and taxis.

Conclusions: In general, the prevalence of seat belt use was not high among drivers and was even lower among passengers. Moreover, drivers and passengers in Asia, the Middle East, and Africa had the lowest prevalence of seat belt usage. Additionally, drivers and passengers of public transportation (buses, minibuses, and taxis) had a lower rate of seat belt use, especially among men. Therefore, effective interventional programs to improve seat belt use should be designed and implemented, particularly among these at-risk populations in Asia, the Middle East, and Africa.

Citing Articles

Injury Patterns in Vehicle Crashes: The Significance of Occupant Seating Position.

Taylor Z, Henken-Siefken A, McCague A Cureus. 2024; 16(2):e53730.

PMID: 38468995 PMC: 10927165. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53730.

Education, incentive, and engineering-based interventions to promote the use of seat belts.

Lourens A, Sinclair M, Willems B, Young T Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 1:CD011218.

PMID: 38197528 PMC: 10777455. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011218.pub2.

References

Siddiqui E, Ejaz K, Waheed S, Kazi G, Khursheed M . Attitudes towards child restrains and seat belts usage in the learned population of Karachi, Pakistan. World J Emerg Med. 2014; 5(3):223-8. PMC: 4163811. DOI: 10.5847/wjem.j.issn.1920-8642.2014.03.012. View

Mohammadi G . Prevalence of seat belt and mobile phone use and road accident injuries amongst college students in Kerman, Iran. Chin J Traumatol. 2011; 14(3):165-9. View

Bhat G, Beck L, Bergen G, Kresnow M . Predictors of rear seat belt use among U.S. adults, 2012. J Safety Res. 2015; 53:103-6. PMC: 6371972. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.03.011. View

Jermakian J, Weast R . Passenger use of and attitudes toward rear seat belts. J Safety Res. 2018; 64:113-119. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.12.006. View

Eluru N, Bhat C . A joint econometric analysis of seat belt use and crash-related injury severity. Accid Anal Prev. 2007; 39(5):1037-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.02.001. View

Lerner E, Jehle D, Billittier 4th A, Moscati R, Connery C, Stiller G . The influence of demographic factors on seatbelt use by adults injured in motor vehicle crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 2001; 33(5):659-62. DOI: 10.1016/s0001-4575(00)00080-4. View

Xiao D, Pengpeng Y, Yichong L, Leilei D, Limin W, Shults R . Prevalence of drink-driving among adults in China: A nationally representative survey in 2010. Traffic Inj Prev. 2016; 18(8):795-800. PMC: 5712434. DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1161760. View

Strine T, Beck L, Bolen J, Okoro C, Dhingra S, Balluz L . Geographic and sociodemographic variation in self-reported seat belt use in the United States. Accid Anal Prev. 2010; 42(4):1066-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.014. View

Colgan F, Gospel A, Petrie J, Adams J, Heywood P, White M . Does rear seat belt use vary according to socioeconomic status?. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004; 58(11):929-30. PMC: 1732617. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2003.016972. View

10.

Abu-Zidan F, Abbas A, Hefny A, Eid H, Grivna M . Effects of seat belt usage on injury pattern and outcome of vehicle occupants after road traffic collisions: prospective study. World J Surg. 2011; 36(2):255-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-011-1386-y. View

11.

Mahfoud Z, Cheema S, Alrouh H, Al-Thani M, Al-Thani A, Mamtani R . Seat belt and mobile phone use among vehicle drivers in the city of Doha, Qatar: an observational study. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15:937. PMC: 4578805. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2283-3. View

12.

Fong C, Keay L, Coxon K, Clarke E, Brown J . Seat belt use and fit among drivers aged 75 years and older in their own vehicles. Traffic Inj Prev. 2015; 17(2):142-50. DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1052420. View

13.

Vecino-Ortiz A, Bishai D, Chandran A, Bhalla K, Bachani A, Gupta S . Seatbelt wearing rates in middle income countries: a cross-country analysis. Accid Anal Prev. 2014; 71:115-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.04.020. View

14.

Iribhogbe P, Osime C . Compliance with seat belt use in Benin City, Nigeria. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008; 23(1):16-9. DOI: 10.1017/s1049023x00005495. View

15.

Siviroj P, Peltzer K, Pengpid S, Morarit S . Non-seatbelt use and associated factors among Thai drivers during Songkran festival. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12:608. PMC: 3490791. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-608. View

16.

Wong T, Lim G, Chow K, Zaw N, Van Nguyen H, Chin H . Buckling up in Singapore: residency and other risk factors for seatbelt non-compliance - a cross-sectional study based on trauma registry data. BMC Public Health. 2016; 16:402. PMC: 4867087. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3080-3. View

17.

Chen S, Kuhn M, Prettner K, Bloom D . The global macroeconomic burden of road injuries: estimates and projections for 166 countries. Lancet Planet Health. 2019; 3(9):e390-e398. DOI: 10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30170-6. View

18.

Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

19.

Sadeghnejad F, Niknami S, Hydarnia A, Montazeri A . Seat-belt use among drivers and front passengers: an observational study from the Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 2014; 20(8):491-7. View

20.

Kim S, Ha N, Hahn H, Lee I, Park M, Park D . Analysis of Facial Injuries in Motor Vehicle Accidents According to the Location of the Seat and Seat-Belt Use. J Craniofac Surg. 2019; 30(7):1949-1951. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005568. View