» Articles » PMID: 28904749

Do You Hear What I See? Vocalization Relative to Visual Detection Rates of Hawaiian Hoary Bats ()

Overview
Journal Ecol Evol
Date 2017 Sep 15
PMID 28904749
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bats vocalize during flight as part of the sensory modality called echolocation, but very little is known about whether flying bats consistently call. Occasional vocal silence during flight when bats approach prey or conspecifics has been documented for relatively few species and situations. Bats flying alone in clutter-free airspace are not known to forgo vocalization, yet prior observations suggested possible silent behavior in certain, unexpected situations. Determining when, why, and where silent behavior occurs in bats will help evaluate major assumptions of a primary monitoring method for bats used in ecological research, management, and conservation. In this study, we recorded flight activity of Hawaiian hoary bats () under seminatural conditions using both thermal video cameras and acoustic detectors. Simultaneous video and audio recordings from 20 nights of observation at 10 sites were analyzed for correspondence between detection methods, with a focus on video observations in three distance categories for which accompanying vocalizations were detected. Comparison of video and audio detections revealed that a high proportion of Hawaiian hoary bats "seen" on video were not simultaneously "heard." On average, only about one in three visual detections within a night had an accompanying call detection, but this varied greatly among nights. Bats flying on curved flight paths and individuals nearer the cameras were more likely to be detected by both methods. Feeding and social calls were detected, but no clear pattern emerged from the small number of observations involving closely interacting bats. These results may indicate that flying Hawaiian hoary bats often forgo echolocation, or do not always vocalize in a way that is detectable with common sampling and monitoring methods. Possible reasons for the low correspondence between visual and acoustic detections range from methodological to biological and include a number of biases associated with the propagation and detection of sound, cryptic foraging strategies, or conspecific presence. Silent flight behavior may be more prevalent in echolocating bats than previously appreciated, has profound implications for ecological research, and deserves further characterization and study.

Citing Articles

Silence and reduced echolocation during flight are associated with social behaviors in male hoary bats (Lasiurus cinereus).

Corcoran A, Weller T, Hopkins A, Yovel Y Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):18637.

PMID: 34545133 PMC: 8452715. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97628-2.


Analysis of Genomic Sequence Data Reveals the Origin and Evolutionary Separation of Hawaiian Hoary Bat Populations.

Pinzari C, Kang L, Michalak P, Jermiin L, Price D, Bonaccorso F Genome Biol Evol. 2020; 12(9):1504-1514.

PMID: 32853363 PMC: 7543519. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evaa137.


Variation in regional and landscape effects on occupancy of temperate bats in the southeastern U.S.

Neece B, Loeb S, Jachowski D PLoS One. 2018; 13(11):e0206857.

PMID: 30408058 PMC: 6226102. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206857.


Multi-state occupancy models of foraging habitat use by the Hawaiian hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus semotus).

Gorresen P, Brinck K, DeLisle M, Montoya-Aiona K, Pinzari C, Bonaccorso F PLoS One. 2018; 13(10):e0205150.

PMID: 30379835 PMC: 6209161. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205150.


Inconspicuous echolocation in hoary bats ().

Corcoran A, Weller T Proc Biol Sci. 2018; 285(1878).

PMID: 29720417 PMC: 5966607. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0441.


References
1.
Holderied M, Von Helversen O . Echolocation range and wingbeat period match in aerial-hawking bats. Proc Biol Sci. 2003; 270(1530):2293-9. PMC: 1691500. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2487. View

2.
Cryan P, Gorresen P, Hein C, Schirmacher M, Diehl R, Huso M . Behavior of bats at wind turbines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(42):15126-31. PMC: 4210316. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1406672111. View

3.
Speakman J, Racey P . No cost of echolocation for bats in flight. Nature. 1991; 350(6317):421-3. DOI: 10.1038/350421a0. View

4.
Tsoar A, Nathan R, Bartan Y, Vyssotski A, DellOmo G, Ulanovsky N . Large-scale navigational map in a mammal. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(37):E718-24. PMC: 3174628. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1107365108. View

5.
Grodzinski U, Spiegel O, Korine C, Holderied M . Context-dependent flight speed: evidence for energetically optimal flight speed in the bat Pipistrellus kuhlii?. J Anim Ecol. 2009; 78(3):540-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01526.x. View