» Articles » PMID: 26596537

Big Brown Bats (Eptesicus Fuscus) Emit Intense Search Calls and Fly in Stereotyped Flight Paths As They Forage in the Wild

Overview
Journal J Exp Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2015 Nov 25
PMID 26596537
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus, uses echolocation for orientation and foraging, and scans its surroundings by aiming its sonar beam at obstacles and prey. All call parameters are highly adaptable and determine the bat's acoustic field of view and hence its perception of the echo scene. The intensity (source level) and directionality of the emitted calls directly contribute to the bat's acoustic field of view; however, the source level and directionality of the big brown bat's sonar signals have not been measured in the field. In addition, for bats, navigation and prey capture require that they process several streams of acoustic information. By using stereotypic flight paths in known areas, bats may be able to reduce the sensory processing load for orientation and therefore allocate echo processing resources to prey. Here we recorded the echolocation calls from foraging E. fuscus in the field with a microphone array and estimated call intensity and directionality, based on reconstructed flight trajectories. The source levels were intense with an average maximum source level of 138 dB (root mean square re. 20 µPa at 0.1 m). Furthermore, measurements taken from a subset of calls indicate that the echolocation signals in the field may be more directional than estimated in the laboratory (half-amplitude angle 30 deg at 35 kHz). We also observed that E. fuscus appear to follow stereotypic flight paths, and propose that this could be a strategy to optimize foraging efficiency by minimizing the sensory processing load.

Citing Articles

Resistance to age-related hearing loss in the echolocating big brown bat ().

Capshaw G, Diebold C, Adams D, Rayner J, Wilkinson G, Moss C Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2034):20241560.

PMID: 39500378 PMC: 11708781. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1560.


Echolocating bats show species-specific variation in susceptibility to acoustic forward masking.

Capshaw G, Diebold C, Sterbing S, Lauer A, Moss C J Acoust Soc Am. 2024; 156(1):511-523.

PMID: 39013168 PMC: 11254387. DOI: 10.1121/10.0026624.


Combining acoustic tracking and LiDAR to study bat flight behaviour in three-dimensional space.

Hermans C, Koblitz J, Bartholomeus H, Stilz P, Visser M, Spoelstra K Mov Ecol. 2023; 11(1):25.

PMID: 37101233 PMC: 10131301. DOI: 10.1186/s40462-023-00387-0.


Drone exploration of bat echolocation: A UAV-borne multimicrophone array to study bat echolocation.

Jespersen C, Docherty D, Hallam J, Albertsen C, Jakobsen L Ecol Evol. 2022; 12(12):e9577.

PMID: 36479036 PMC: 9719081. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9577.


Acoustic localization of terrestrial wildlife: Current practices and future opportunities.

Rhinehart T, Chronister L, Devlin T, Kitzes J Ecol Evol. 2020; 10(13):6794-6818.

PMID: 32724552 PMC: 7381569. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6216.