» Articles » PMID: 28861198

Lumbar Single-Level Dynamic Stabilization with Semi-Rigid and Full Dynamic Systems: A Retrospective Clinical and Radiological Analysis of 71 Patients

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2017 Sep 2
PMID 28861198
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study compares the clinical and radiological results of three most commonly used dynamic stabilization systems in the field of orthopedic surgery.

Methods: A total of 71 patients underwent single-level posterior transpedicular dynamic stabilization between 2011 and 2014 due to lumbar degenerative disc disease. Three different dynamic systems used include: (1) the Dynesys system; (2) a dynamic screw with a PEEK rod; and (3) a full dynamic system (a dynamic screw with a dynamic rod; BalanC). The mean patient age was 45.8 years. The mean follow-up was 29.7 months. Clinical and radiological data were obtained for each patient preoperatively and at 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up.

Results: Clinical outcomes were significantly improved in all patients. There were no significant differences in the radiological outcomes among the groups divided according to the system used. Screw loosening was detected in 2 patients, and 1 patient developed screw breakage. All patients with screw loosening or breakage underwent revision surgery.

Conclusions: Each procedure offered satisfactory outcome regardless of which system was applied.

Citing Articles

Can Dynamic Spinal Stabilization Be an Alternative to Fusion Surgery in Adult Spinal Deformity Cases?.

Ozer A, Akgun M, Ucar E, Hekimoglu M, Basak A, Gunerbuyuk C Int J Spine Surg. 2024; 18(2):152-163.

PMID: 38561203 PMC: 11287803. DOI: 10.14444/8588.


Clinical and radiological analysis of the effects of three different lumbar transpedicular dynamic stabilization system on disc degeneration and regeneration.

Karadag M, Akgun M, Basak A, Ates O, Tepebasili M, Gunerbuyuk C Front Surg. 2024; 10:1297790.

PMID: 38162089 PMC: 10757836. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1297790.


Microscopic Unilateral Approach for Bilateral Decompression of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Kaptan H, Kasimcan O, Ozyoruk S, Yilmaz M Arch Iran Med. 2023; 25(11):742-747.

PMID: 37543899 PMC: 10685853. DOI: 10.34172/aim.2022.117.


Stress Distribution of Different Pedicle Screw Insertion Techniques Following Single-Segment TLIF: A Finite Element Analysis Study.

Yang S, Sun T, Zhang L, Cong M, Guo A, Liu D Orthop Surg. 2023; 15(4):1153-1164.

PMID: 36855914 PMC: 10102325. DOI: 10.1111/os.13671.


Comparison of clinical and radiological results of dynamic and rigid instrumentation in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Varol E, Etli M, Avci F, Yaltirik C, Ramazanoglu A, Resid Onen M J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2022; 13(3):350-356.

PMID: 36263334 PMC: 9574106. DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_63_22.


References
1.
Mohi Eldin M, Ali A . Lumbar transpedicular implant failure: a clinical and surgical challenge and its radiological assessment. Asian Spine J. 2014; 8(3):281-97. PMC: 4068848. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.3.281. View

2.
Oktenoglu T, Erbulut D, Kiapour A, Ozer A, Lazoglu I, Kaner T . Pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilisation of the lumbar spine: in vitro cadaver investigation and a finite element study. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2014; 18(11):1252-1261. DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2014.890187. View

3.
Schaeren S, Broger I, Jeanneret B . Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(18):E636-42. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817d2435. View

4.
Park P, Garton H, Gala V, Hoff J, McGillicuddy J . Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(17):1938-44. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000137069.88904.03. View

5.
Fay L, Wu J, Tsai T, Tu T, Wu C, Huang W . Intervertebral disc rehydration after lumbar dynamic stabilization: magnetic resonance image evaluation with a mean followup of four years. Adv Orthop. 2013; 2013:437570. PMC: 3657439. DOI: 10.1155/2013/437570. View