» Articles » PMID: 28807870

An Open, Multi-vendor, Multi-field-strength Brain MR Dataset and Analysis of Publicly Available Skull Stripping Methods Agreement

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2017 Aug 16
PMID 28807870
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper presents an open, multi-vendor, multi-field strength magnetic resonance (MR) T1-weighted volumetric brain imaging dataset, named Calgary-Campinas-359 (CC-359). The dataset is composed of images of older healthy adults (29-80 years) acquired on scanners from three vendors (Siemens, Philips and General Electric) at both 1.5 T and 3 T. CC-359 is comprised of 359 datasets, approximately 60 subjects per vendor and magnetic field strength. The dataset is approximately age and gender balanced, subject to the constraints of the available images. It provides consensus brain extraction masks for all volumes generated using supervised classification. Manual segmentation results for twelve randomly selected subjects performed by an expert are also provided. The CC-359 dataset allows investigation of 1) the influences of both vendor and magnetic field strength on quantitative analysis of brain MR; 2) parameter optimization for automatic segmentation methods; and potentially 3) machine learning classifiers with big data, specifically those based on deep learning methods, as these approaches require a large amount of data. To illustrate the utility of this dataset, we compared to the results of a supervised classifier, the results of eight publicly available skull stripping methods and one publicly available consensus algorithm. A linear mixed effects model analysis indicated that vendor (p-value<0.001) and magnetic field strength (p-value<0.001) have statistically significant impacts on skull stripping results.

Citing Articles

A Neural Network Approach to Identify Left-Right Orientation of Anatomical Brain MRI.

Nishimaki K, Iyatomi H, Oishi K Brain Behav. 2025; 15(2):e70299.

PMID: 39924951 PMC: 11808181. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70299.


Sex differences in brain MRI using deep learning toward fairer healthcare outcomes.

Dibaji M, Ospel J, Souza R, Bento M Front Comput Neurosci. 2024; 18:1452457.

PMID: 39606583 PMC: 11598355. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2024.1452457.


OpenMAP-T1: A Rapid Deep-Learning Approach to Parcellate 280 Anatomical Regions to Cover the Whole Brain.

Nishimaki K, Onda K, Ikuta K, Chotiyanonta J, Uchida Y, Mori S Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(16):e70063.

PMID: 39523990 PMC: 11551626. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70063.


A review of artificial intelligence-based brain age estimation and its applications for related diseases.

Azzam M, Xu Z, Liu R, Li L, Meng Soh K, Challagundla K Brief Funct Genomics. 2024; 24.

PMID: 39436320 PMC: 11735757. DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/elae042.


Analysis of Brain Age Gap across Subject Cohorts and Prediction Model Architectures.

Dular L, Spiclin Z, For The Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative , The Australian Imaging Biomarkers And Lifestyle Flagship Study Of Ageing Biomedicines. 2024; 12(9).

PMID: 39335651 PMC: 11428686. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12092139.