» Articles » PMID: 28747480

Effects of Age and Reproductive Status on Individual Foraging Site Fidelity in a Long-lived Marine Predator

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2017 Jul 28
PMID 28747480
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Individual foraging specializations, where individuals use a small component of the population niche width, are widespread in nature with important ecological and evolutionary implications. In long-lived animals, foraging ability develops with age, but we know little about the ontogeny of individuality in foraging. Here we use precision global positioning system (GPS) loggers to examine how individual foraging site fidelity (IFSF), a common component of foraging specialization, varies between breeders, failed breeders and immatures in a long-lived marine predator-the northern gannet Breeders (aged 5+) showed strong IFSF: they had similar routes and were faithful to distal points during successive trips. However, centrally placed immatures (aged 2-3) were far more exploratory and lacked route or foraging site fidelity. Failed breeders were intermediate: some with strong fidelity, others being more exploratory. Individual foraging specializations were previously thought to arise as a function of heritable phenotypic differences or via social transmission. Our results instead suggest a third alternative-in long-lived species foraging sites are learned during exploratory behaviours early in life, which become canalized with age and experience, and refined where possible-the exploration-refinement foraging hypothesis. We speculate similar patterns may be present in other long-lived species and moreover that long periods of immaturity may be a consequence of such memory-based individual foraging strategies.

Citing Articles

A marine predator relies on both social cues and frequently updated memory to search for prey.

Collet J, Thiebault A, Bonnet-Lebrun A, Tremblay Y, Carpenter-Kling T, Keys D Proc Biol Sci. 2025; 292(2041):20242327.

PMID: 39968623 PMC: 11836699. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2327.


Role of protected areas for a colonial-breeding waterbird in a fragmented landscape throughout its annual cycle.

Ferreira H, Alves J, Jiguet F, Duriez O, Blanchon T, Lok T Landsc Ecol. 2025; 40(1):6.

PMID: 39959651 PMC: 11828808. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-024-02017-5.


Learning on the job? Foraging strategies of juvenile versus adult Lesser black-backed gulls at their first migratory stopover.

Morel M, Allaert R, Stienen E, Fijn R, Verbruggen F, Muller W R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(12):241224.

PMID: 39665099 PMC: 11631423. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.241224.


Competition and Facilitation Influence Central Place Foraging Ecology in a Colonial Marine Predator.

Langley L, Cox S, Patrick S, Votier S Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(11):e70494.

PMID: 39588348 PMC: 11586682. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70494.


Central place foragers, prey depletion halos, and how behavioral niche partitioning promotes consumer coexistence.

Rueffler C, Lehmann L Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(46):e2411780121.

PMID: 39514310 PMC: 11573678. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2411780121.


References
1.
Dobson F, Jouventin P . How slow breeding can be selected in seabirds: testing Lack's hypothesis. Proc Biol Sci. 2006; 274(1607):275-9. PMC: 1685855. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3724. View

2.
Hamer K, HUMPHREYS E, Magalhaes M, Garthe S, Hennicke J, Peters G . Fine-scale foraging behaviour of a medium-ranging marine predator. J Anim Ecol. 2009; 78(4):880-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01549.x. View

3.
Scales K, Miller P, Embling C, Ingram S, Pirotta E, Votier S . Mesoscale fronts as foraging habitats: composite front mapping reveals oceanographic drivers of habitat use for a pelagic seabird. J R Soc Interface. 2014; 11(100):20140679. PMC: 4191095. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0679. View

4.
Bolnick D, Doebeli M . Sexual dimorphism and adaptive speciation: two sides of the same ecological coin. Evolution. 2003; 57(11):2433-49. DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01489.x. View

5.
Bolnick D, Svanback R, Fordyce J, Yang L, Davis J, Hulsey C . The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am Nat. 2003; 161(1):1-28. DOI: 10.1086/343878. View