» Articles » PMID: 35232237

Prey Encounters and Spatial Memory Influence Use of Foraging Patches in a Marine Central Place Forager

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Mar 2
PMID 35232237
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Given the patchiness and long-term predictability of marine resources, memory of high-quality foraging grounds is expected to provide fitness advantages for central place foragers. However, it remains challenging to characterize how marine predators integrate memory with recent prey encounters to adjust fine-scale movement and use of foraging patches. Here, we used two months of movement data from harbour seals () to quantify the repeatability in foraging patches as a proxy for memory. We then integrated these data into analyses of fine-scale movement and underwater behaviour to test how both spatial memory and prey encounter rates influenced the seals' area-restricted search (ARS) behaviour. Specifically, we used one month's GPS data from 29 individuals to build spatial memory maps of searched areas and archived accelerometery data from a subset of five individuals to detect prey catch attempts, a proxy for prey encounters. Individuals were highly consistent in the areas they visited over two consecutive months. Hidden Markov models showed that both spatial memory and prey encounters increased the probability of seals initiating ARS. These results provide evidence that predators use memory to adjust their fine-scale movement, and this ability should be accounted for in movement models.

Citing Articles

Desert ants avoid ambush predator pits depending on position, visual landmarks and trapped nestmates.

Bar A, Raveh-Pal E, Subach A, Foitzik S, Scharf I R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(12):241500.

PMID: 39698156 PMC: 11651900. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.241500.


Movements and spatial usage of harbour seals in the Elbe estuary in Germany.

van Neer A, Nachtsheim D, Siebert U, Taupp T Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):6630.

PMID: 37095305 PMC: 10125962. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-33594-1.


Drivers of polar bear behavior and the possible effects of prey availability on foraging strategy.

Togunov R, Derocher A, Lunn N, Auger-Methe M Mov Ecol. 2022; 10(1):50.

PMID: 36384775 PMC: 9670556. DOI: 10.1186/s40462-022-00351-4.


Equivalence classification, learning by exclusion, and long-term memory in pinnipeds: cognitive mechanisms demonstrated through research with subjects under human care and in the field.

Biolsi K, Woo K Anim Cogn. 2022; 25(5):1077-1090.

PMID: 35900682 DOI: 10.1007/s10071-022-01658-w.


Desert Ants Learn to Avoid Pitfall Traps While Foraging.

Bar A, Marom C, Zorin N, Gilad T, Subach A, Foitzik S Biology (Basel). 2022; 11(6).

PMID: 35741418 PMC: 9219994. DOI: 10.3390/biology11060897.


References
1.
Collet J, Weimerskirch H . Albatrosses can memorize locations of predictable fishing boats but favour natural foraging. Proc Biol Sci. 2020; 287(1932):20200958. PMC: 7575524. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0958. View

2.
Fagan W, Gurarie E, Bewick S, Howard A, Cantrell R, Cosner C . Perceptual Ranges, Information Gathering, and Foraging Success in Dynamic Landscapes. Am Nat. 2017; 189(5):474-489. DOI: 10.1086/691099. View

3.
Sharples R, Moss S, Patterson T, Hammond P . Spatial variation in foraging behaviour of a marine top predator (Phoca vitulina) determined by a large-scale satellite tagging program. PLoS One. 2012; 7(5):e37216. PMC: 3357409. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037216. View

4.
Polansky L, Kilian W, Wittemyer G . Elucidating the significance of spatial memory on movement decisions by African savannah elephants using state-space models. Proc Biol Sci. 2015; 282(1805). PMC: 4389615. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.3042. View

5.
Cox S, Orgeret F, Gesta M, Rodde C, Heizer I, Weimerskirch H . Processing of acceleration and dive data on-board satellite relay tags to investigate diving and foraging behaviour in free-ranging marine predators. Methods Ecol Evol. 2018; 9(1):64-77. PMC: 5812097. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12845. View