» Articles » PMID: 24563670

A Majority of Low (1-10%) ER Positive Breast Cancers Behave Like Hormone Receptor Negative Tumors

Overview
Journal J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2014 Feb 25
PMID 24563670
Citations 46
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The 2010 guidelines by ASCO-CAP have mandated that breast cancer specimens with ≥1% positively staining cells by immunohistochemistry should be considered Estrogen Receptor (ER) positive. This has led to a subclass of low-ER positive (1-10%) breast cancers. We have examined the biology and clinical behavior of these low ER staining tumors.

Methods: We have developed a probabilistic score of the "ER-positivity" by quantitative estimation of ER related gene transcripts from FFPE specimens. Immunohistochemistry for ER was done on 240 surgically excised tumors of primary breast cancer. Relative transcript abundance of 3 house-keeping genes and 6 ER related genes were determined by q-RT PCR. A logistic regression model using 3 ER associated genes provided the best probability function, and a cut-off value was derived by ROC analysis. 144 high ER (>10%), 75 ER negative and 21 low-ER (1-10%) tumors were evaluated using the probability score and the disease specific survival was compared.

Results: Half of the low-ER positive tumors were assigned to the ER negative group based on the probability score; in contrast 95% of ER negative and 92% of the high ER positive tumors were assigned to the appropriate ER group (p<0.0001). The survival of the low-ER group was intermediate between that of the high ER positive and ER negative groups (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Our results suggest that the newly lowered ASCO-CAP criteria for ER positivity, leads to the false categorization of biologically ER negative tumors as ER positive ones. This may have particular relevance to India, where we have a much higher proportion of ER negative tumors in general.

Citing Articles

Naringenin as potent anticancer phytocompound in breast carcinoma: from mechanistic approach to nanoformulations based therapeutics.

Elsori D, Pandey P, Ramniwas S, Kumar R, Lakhanpal S, Rab S Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1406619.

PMID: 38957397 PMC: 11217354. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1406619.


Elucidating the Role of MicroRNA-18a in Propelling a Hybrid Epithelial-Mesenchymal Phenotype and Driving Malignant Progression in ER-Negative Breast Cancer.

Nair M, Mavatkar A, Naidu C, V P S, C E A, Rajarajan S Cells. 2024; 13(10.

PMID: 38786043 PMC: 11119613. DOI: 10.3390/cells13100821.


Real-world data of HER2-negative early breast cancer patients treated with anthracycline and/or taxane regimens in Japan.

Shimomura A, Sagara Y, Koto R, Fujiwara M, Kanemura Y, Kitagawa H Breast Cancer. 2024; 31(4):581-592.

PMID: 38679657 PMC: 11194198. DOI: 10.1007/s12282-024-01572-8.


Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and prognosis between HR-low/HER2-negative BC and TNBC: an exploratory real-world multicentre cohort study.

Peng J, Hong Y, Chen Q, Xu F, Zhang D, Yao J Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1347762.

PMID: 38567311 PMC: 10985142. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1347762.


Defining the Biology of Estrogen Receptor-Low-Positive Breast Cancer.

Higgins T, Kantor O, Harrison B, Giordano J, McGrath M, Burstein H Ann Surg Oncol. 2023; 31(4):2244-2252.

PMID: 38161200 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14835-z.


References
1.
J van t Veer L, Dai H, van de Vijver M, He Y, Hart A, Mao M . Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature. 2002; 415(6871):530-6. DOI: 10.1038/415530a. View

2.
Badve S, Baehner F, Gray R, Childs B, Maddala T, Liu M . Estrogen- and progesterone-receptor status in ECOG 2197: comparison of immunohistochemistry by local and central laboratories and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction by central laboratory. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(15):2473-81. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.6424. View

3.
Gruvberger S, Ringner M, Chen Y, Panavally S, Saal L, Borg A . Estrogen receptor status in breast cancer is associated with remarkably distinct gene expression patterns. Cancer Res. 2001; 61(16):5979-84. View

4.
Kim C, Tang G, Pogue-Geile K, Costantino J, Baehner F, Baker J . Estrogen receptor (ESR1) mRNA expression and benefit from tamoxifen in the treatment and prevention of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29(31):4160-7. PMC: 3208536. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.9615. View

5.
Badve S, Tudor Vladislav I, Spaulding B, Strickland A, Hernandez S, Bird-Turner L . EP1: a novel rabbit monoclonal antibody for detection of oestrogen receptor α. J Clin Pathol. 2013; 66(12):1051-7. PMC: 3841770. DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2012-201391. View