» Articles » PMID: 28701942

Neural Mechanisms Underlying Conscious and Unconscious Gaze-Triggered Attentional Orienting in Autism Spectrum Disorder

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2017 Jul 14
PMID 28701942
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Impaired joint attention represents the core clinical feature of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Behavioral studies have suggested that gaze-triggered attentional orienting is intact in response to supraliminally presented eyes but impaired in response to subliminally presented eyes in individuals with ASD. However, the neural mechanisms underlying conscious and unconscious gaze-triggered attentional orienting remain unclear. We investigated this issue in ASD and typically developing (TD) individuals using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. The participants viewed cue stimuli of averted or straight eye gaze direction presented either supraliminally or subliminally and then localized a target. Reaction times were shorter when eye-gaze cues were directionally valid compared with when they were neutral under the supraliminal condition in both groups; the same pattern was found in the TD group but not the ASD group under the subliminal condition. The temporo-parieto-frontal regions showed stronger activation in response to averted eyes than to straight eyes in both groups under the supraliminal condition. The left amygdala was more activated while viewing averted vs. straight eyes in the TD group than in the ASD group under the subliminal condition. These findings provide an explanation for the neural mechanisms underlying the impairment in unconscious but not conscious gaze-triggered attentional orienting in individuals with ASD and suggest possible neurological and behavioral interventions to facilitate their joint attention behaviors.

Citing Articles

Neuroimaging Insights into Autism Spectrum Disorder: Structural and Functional Brain.

Patil M, Iftikhar N, Ganti L Health Psychol Res. 2025; 12:123439.

PMID: 39944713 PMC: 11820129. DOI: 10.52965/001c.123439.


Unconscious and Conscious Gaze-Triggered Attentional Orienting: Distinguishing Innate and Acquired Components of Social Attention in Children and Adults with Autistic Traits and Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Yang F, Tian J, Yuan P, Liu C, Zhang X, Yang L Research (Wash D C). 2024; 7:0417.

PMID: 38988610 PMC: 11233194. DOI: 10.34133/research.0417.


Examining the Dominant Presence of Brain Grey Matter in Autism During Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Batouli S, Razavi F, Sisakhti M, Oghabian Z, Ahmadzade H, Tehrani Doost M Basic Clin Neurosci. 2024; 14(5):585-604.

PMID: 38628837 PMC: 11016874. DOI: 10.32598/bcn.2021.1774.3.


Neural circuit disruptions of eye gaze processing in autism spectrum disorder and schizophrenia: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Ibrahim K, Iturmendi-Sabater I, Vasishth M, Barron D, Guardavaccaro M, Funaro M Schizophr Res. 2024; 264:298-313.

PMID: 38215566 PMC: 10922721. DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2023.12.003.


Uncovering the cognitive mechanisms underlying the gaze cueing effect.

Alister M, McKay K, Sewell D, Evans N Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023; 77(4):803-827.

PMID: 37246917 PMC: 10960327. DOI: 10.1177/17470218231181238.


References
1.
Uono S, Sato W, Toichi M . The specific impairment of fearful expression recognition and its atypical development in pervasive developmental disorder. Soc Neurosci. 2011; 6(5-6):452-63. DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2011.605593. View

2.
Friston K, Zarahn E, Josephs O, Henson R, Dale A . Stochastic designs in event-related fMRI. Neuroimage. 1999; 10(5):607-19. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1999.0498. View

3.
Simons D, Rensink R . Change blindness: past, present, and future. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005; 9(1):16-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.11.006. View

4.
Kingstone A, Tipper C, Ristic J, Ngan E . The eyes have it!: an fMRI investigation. Brain Cogn. 2004; 55(2):269-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.037. View

5.
Vuilleumier P . How brains beware: neural mechanisms of emotional attention. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005; 9(12):585-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.011. View