» Articles » PMID: 37246917

Uncovering the Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying the Gaze Cueing Effect

Overview
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 2023 May 29
PMID 37246917
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The gaze cueing effect is the tendency for people to respond faster to targets appearing at locations gazed at by others, compared with locations gazed away from by others. The effect is robust, widely studied, and is an influential finding within social cognition. Formal evidence accumulation models provide the dominant theoretical account of the cognitive processes underlying speeded decision-making, but they have rarely been applied to social cognition research. In this study, using a combination of individual-level and hierarchical computational modelling techniques, we applied evidence accumulation models to gaze cueing data (three data sets total,  = 171, 139,001 trials) for the first time to assess the relative capacity that an attentional orienting mechanism and information processing mechanisms have for explaining the gaze cueing effect. We found that most participants were best described by the attentional orienting mechanism, such that response times were slower at gazed away from locations because they had to reorient to the target before they could process the cue. However, we found evidence for individual differences, whereby the models suggested that some gaze cueing effects were driven by a short allocation of information processing resources to the gazed at location, allowing for a brief period where orienting and processing could occur in parallel. There was exceptionally little evidence to suggest any sustained reallocation of information processing resources neither at the group nor individual level. We discuss how this individual variability might represent credible individual differences in the cognitive mechanisms that subserve behaviourally observed gaze cueing effects.

Citing Articles

What can evidence accumulation modelling tell us about human social cognition?.

Parker S, Ramsey R Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023; 77(3):639-655.

PMID: 37154622 PMC: 10880422. DOI: 10.1177/17470218231176950.

References
1.
Cruwell S, Evans N . Preregistration in diverse contexts: a preregistration template for the application of cognitive models. R Soc Open Sci. 2021; 8(10):210155. PMC: 8511762. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.210155. View

2.
McKay K, Grainger S, Coundouris S, Skorich D, Phillips L, Henry J . Visual attentional orienting by eye gaze: A meta-analytic review of the gaze-cueing effect. Psychol Bull. 2022; 147(12):1269-1289. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000353. View

3.
Gregory S, Jackson M . Increased perceptual distraction and task demand enhances gaze and non-biological cuing effects. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020; 74(2):221-240. DOI: 10.1177/1747021820959633. View

4.
Emery N . The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2000; 24(6):581-604. DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7634(00)00025-7. View

5.
Ha J, Hayward D . Are you paying attention to me? The effect of social presence on spatial attention to gaze and arrows. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022; 85(1):41-51. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02618-9. View