» Articles » PMID: 28676725

Inter-individual Variability in the Foraging Behaviour of Traplining Bumblebees

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2017 Jul 6
PMID 28676725
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Workers of social insects, such as bees, ants and wasps, show some degree of inter-individual variability in decision-making, learning and memory. Whether these natural cognitive differences translate into distinct adaptive behavioural strategies is virtually unknown. Here we examined variability in the movement patterns of bumblebee foragers establishing routes between artificial flowers. We recorded all flower visitation sequences performed by 29 bees tested for 20 consecutive foraging bouts in three experimental arrays, each characterised by a unique spatial configuration of artificial flowers and three-dimensional landmarks. All bees started to develop efficient routes as they accumulated foraging experience in each array, and showed consistent inter-individual differences in their levels of route fidelity and foraging performance, as measured by travel speed and the frequency of revisits to flowers. While the tendency of bees to repeat the same route was influenced by their colony origin, foraging performance was correlated to body size. The largest foragers travelled faster and made less revisits to empty flowers. We discuss the possible adaptive value of such inter-individual variability within the forager caste for optimisation of colony-level foraging performances in social pollinators.

Citing Articles

Roads are partial barriers to foraging solitary bees in an urban landscape.

Markovits C, Dorian N, Crone E Oecologia. 2024; 207(1):7.

PMID: 39652272 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-024-05652-6.


Age dominates flight distance and duration, while body size shapes flight speed in L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae).

Gilgenreiner M, Kurze C Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2027):20241001.

PMID: 39079662 PMC: 11288671. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1001.


Using motion-detection cameras to monitor foraging behaviour of individual butterflies.

Dalbosco DellAglio D, McMillan O, Montgomery S Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(7):e70032.

PMID: 39041014 PMC: 11260874. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70032.


Bumblebee flower constancy and pollen diversity over time.

Yourstone J, Varadarajan V, Olsson O Behav Ecol. 2023; 34(4):602-612.

PMID: 37434641 PMC: 10332455. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arad028.


Modeling bee movement shows how a perceptual masking effect can influence flower discovery.

Moran A, Lihoreau M, Perez-Escudero A, Gautrais J PLoS Comput Biol. 2023; 19(3):e1010558.

PMID: 36961828 PMC: 10075415. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010558.


References
1.
Reynolds A, Lihoreau M, Chittka L . A simple iterative model accurately captures complex trapline formation by bumblebees across spatial scales and flower arrangements. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013; 9(3):e1002938. PMC: 3591286. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002938. View

2.
Jeanson R, Weidenmuller A . Interindividual variability in social insects - proximate causes and ultimate consequences. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2013; 89(3):671-87. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12074. View

3.
Nettle D . The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. Am Psychol. 2006; 61(6):622-31. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.6.622. View

4.
Lihoreau M, Chittka L, Le Comber S, Raine N . Bees do not use nearest-neighbour rules for optimization of multi-location routes. Biol Lett. 2011; 8(1):13-6. PMC: 3259973. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0661. View

5.
Planas-Sitja I, Deneubourg J, Gibon C, Sempo G . Group personality during collective decision-making: a multi-level approach. Proc Biol Sci. 2015; 282(1802). PMC: 4344149. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2515. View