» Articles » PMID: 29941567

Disease Outbreak Thresholds Emerge from Interactions Between Movement Behavior, Landscape Structure, and Epidemiology

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2018 Jun 27
PMID 29941567
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Disease models have provided conflicting evidence as to whether spatial heterogeneity promotes or impedes pathogen persistence. Moreover, there has been limited theoretical investigation into how animal movement behavior interacts with the spatial organization of resources (e.g., clustered, random, uniform) across a landscape to affect infectious disease dynamics. Importantly, spatial heterogeneity of resources can sometimes lead to nonlinear or counterintuitive outcomes depending on the host and pathogen system. There is a clear need to develop a general theoretical framework that could be used to create testable predictions for specific host-pathogen systems. Here, we develop an individual-based model integrated with movement ecology approaches to investigate how host movement behaviors interact with landscape heterogeneity (in the form of various levels of resource abundance and clustering) to affect pathogen dynamics. For most of the parameter space, our results support the counterintuitive idea that fragmentation promotes pathogen persistence, but this finding was largely dependent on perceptual range of the host, conspecific density, and recovery rate. For simulations with high conspecific density, slower recovery rates, and larger perceptual ranges, more complex disease dynamics emerged, and the most fragmented landscapes were not necessarily the most conducive to outbreaks or pathogen persistence. These results point to the importance of interactions between landscape structure, individual movement behavior, and pathogen transmission for predicting and understanding disease dynamics.

Citing Articles

How do non-independent host movements affect spatio-temporal disease dynamics? Partitioning the contributions of spatial overlap and correlated movements to transmission risk.

Vargas Soto J, Kosiewska J, Grove D, Metts D, Muller L, Wilber M Mov Ecol. 2025; 13(1):11.

PMID: 40012019 PMC: 11866778. DOI: 10.1186/s40462-025-00539-4.


Spatial Landscape Structure Influences Cross-Species Transmission in a Rabies-like Virus Model.

Forero-Munoz N, Dansereau G, Viard F, Acheson E, Leighton P, Poisot T Microorganisms. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 40005781 PMC: 11858330. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms13020416.


Artificial Attractants: Implications for Disease Management in Deer.

Gritter K, Pybus M, Lewis M, Merrill E Ecol Evol. 2025; 15(2):e71013.

PMID: 39981545 PMC: 11840243. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.71013.


Landscape-scale drivers of spatial dynamics and genetic diversity in an emerging wildlife pathogen.

Saenz V, Byrne A, Ohmer M, Hammond T, Brannelly L, Altman K Oecologia. 2024; 207(1):3.

PMID: 39643763 PMC: 11624241. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-024-05642-8.


The influence of social and spatial processes on the epidemiology of environmentally transmitted pathogens in wildlife: implications for management.

Pandey A, Wojan C, Feuka A, Craft M, Manlove K, Pepin K Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024; 379(1912):20220532.

PMID: 39230447 PMC: 11449208. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0532.


References
1.
Plowright R, Foley P, Field H, Dobson A, Foley J, Eby P . Urban habituation, ecological connectivity and epidemic dampening: the emergence of Hendra virus from flying foxes (Pteropus spp.). Proc Biol Sci. 2011; 278(1725):3703-12. PMC: 3203503. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0522. View

2.
White L, Forester J, Craft M . Dynamic, spatial models of parasite transmission in wildlife: Their structure, applications and remaining challenges. J Anim Ecol. 2017; 87(3):559-580. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12761. View

3.
Herrick K, Huettmann F, Lindgren M . A global model of avian influenza prediction in wild birds: the importance of northern regions. Vet Res. 2013; 44:42. PMC: 3687566. DOI: 10.1186/1297-9716-44-42. View

4.
Cutler D, Edwards Jr T, Beard K, Cutler A, Hess K, Gibson J . Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology. 2007; 88(11):2783-92. DOI: 10.1890/07-0539.1. View

5.
Brown L, Crone E . Individual variation changes dispersal distance and area requirements of a checkerspot butterfly. Ecology. 2016; 97(1):106-15. DOI: 10.1002/ecy.1216. View