» Articles » PMID: 21849311

Bees Do Not Use Nearest-neighbour Rules for Optimization of Multi-location Routes

Overview
Journal Biol Lett
Specialty Biology
Date 2011 Aug 19
PMID 21849311
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Animals collecting patchily distributed resources are faced with complex multi-location routing problems. Rather than comparing all possible routes, they often find reasonably short solutions by simply moving to the nearest unvisited resources when foraging. Here, we report the travel optimization performance of bumble-bees (Bombus terrestris) foraging in a flight cage containing six artificial flowers arranged such that movements between nearest-neighbour locations would lead to a long suboptimal route. After extensive training (80 foraging bouts and at least 640 flower visits), bees reduced their flight distances and prioritized shortest possible routes, while almost never following nearest-neighbour solutions. We discuss possible strategies used during the establishment of stable multi-location routes (or traplines), and how these could allow bees and other animals to solve complex routing problems through experience, without necessarily requiring a sophisticated cognitive representation of space.

Citing Articles

Reinforcement learning as a robotics-inspired framework for insect navigation: from spatial representations to neural implementation.

Lochner S, Honerkamp D, Valada A, Straw A Front Comput Neurosci. 2024; 18:1460006.

PMID: 39314666 PMC: 11416953. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2024.1460006.


Choosing the best way: how wild common marmosets travel to efficiently exploit resources.

Xavier D, Abreu F, Souto A, Schiel N Anim Cogn. 2024; 27(1):20.

PMID: 38429612 PMC: 10907437. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-024-01864-8.


A Sublethal Concentration of Sulfoxaflor Has Minimal Impact on Buff-Tailed Bumblebee () Locomotor Behaviour under Aversive Conditioning.

James L, Reynolds A, Mellor I, Davies T Toxics. 2023; 11(3).

PMID: 36977044 PMC: 10057571. DOI: 10.3390/toxics11030279.


Modeling bee movement shows how a perceptual masking effect can influence flower discovery.

Moran A, Lihoreau M, Perez-Escudero A, Gautrais J PLoS Comput Biol. 2023; 19(3):e1010558.

PMID: 36961828 PMC: 10075415. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010558.


Mild movement sequence repetition in five primate species and evidence for a taxonomic divide in cognitive mechanisms.

Kumpan L, Vining A, Joyce M, Aguado W, Smeltzer E, Turner S Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):14503.

PMID: 36008452 PMC: 9411198. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18633-7.


References
1.
Wiener J, Ehbauer N, Mallot H . Planning paths to multiple targets: memory involvement and planning heuristics in spatial problem solving. Psychol Res. 2008; 73(5):644-58. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-008-0181-3. View

2.
Lihoreau M, Chittka L, Raine N, Kudo G . Trade-off between travel distance and prioritization of high-reward sites in traplining bumblebees. Funct Ecol. 2012; 25(6):1284-1292. PMC: 3260656. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01881.x. View

3.
Collett M . Spatial memories in insects. Curr Biol. 2010; 19(24):R1103-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.10.004. View

4.
Saleh N, Chittka L . Traplining in bumblebees (Bombus impatiens): a foraging strategy's ontogeny and the importance of spatial reference memory in short-range foraging. Oecologia. 2006; 151(4):719-30. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-006-0607-9. View

5.
Srinivasan M, Zhang S, Altwein M, Tautz J . Honeybee navigation: nature and calibration of the "odometer". Science. 2000; 287(5454):851-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.287.5454.851. View