» Articles » PMID: 28667019

Retrotransposons Are the Major Contributors to the Expansion of the Muller F Element

Overview
Journal G3 (Bethesda)
Date 2017 Jul 2
PMID 28667019
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The discordance between genome size and the complexity of eukaryotes can partly be attributed to differences in repeat density. The Muller F element (∼5.2 Mb) is the smallest chromosome in , but it is substantially larger (>18.7 Mb) in To identify the major contributors to the expansion of the F element and to assess their impact, we improved the genome sequence and annotated the genes in a 1.4-Mb region of the F element, and a 1.7-Mb region from the D element for comparison. We find that transposons (particularly LTR and LINE retrotransposons) are major contributors to this expansion (78.6%), while sequences integrated into the genome are minor contributors (0.02%). Both and F-element genes exhibit distinct characteristics compared to D-element genes (, larger coding spans, larger introns, more coding exons, and lower codon bias), but these differences are exaggerated in Compared to , the codon bias observed in F-element genes can primarily be attributed to mutational biases instead of selection. The 5' ends of F-element genes in both species are enriched in dimethylation of lysine 4 on histone 3 (H3K4me2), while the coding spans are enriched in H3K9me2. Despite differences in repeat density and gene characteristics, F-element genes show a similar range of expression levels compared to genes in euchromatic domains. This study improves our understanding of how transposons can affect genome size and how genes can function within highly repetitive domains.

Citing Articles

A genomics learning framework for undergraduates.

Reed L, Kleinschmit A, Buonaccorsi V, Hunt A, Chalker D, Williams J PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0313124.

PMID: 39787200 PMC: 11717232. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313124.


Teaching transposon classification as a means to crowd source the curation of repeat annotation - a tardigrade perspective.

Peona V, Martelossi J, Almojil D, Bocharkina J, Brannstrom I, Brown M Mob DNA. 2024; 15(1):10.

PMID: 38711146 PMC: 11071193. DOI: 10.1186/s13100-024-00319-8.


Supporting the democratization of science during a pandemic: genomics Course-based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs) as an effective remote learning strategy.

Lopatto D, Silver Key S, Van Stry M, Siders J, Leung W, Sandlin K J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2024; 24(3).

PMID: 38230306 PMC: 10790580. DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.00039-23.


Manual annotation of genes: a Genomics Education Partnership protocol.

Rele C, Sandlin K, Leung W, Reed L F1000Res. 2023; 11:1579.

PMID: 37854289 PMC: 10579860. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.126839.3.


The Genomics Education Partnership: First findings on genomics research in community colleges.

Croonquist P, Falkenberg V, Minkovsky N, Sawa A, Skerritt M, Sustacek M Scholarsh Pract Undergrad Res. 2023; 6(3):17-28.

PMID: 37731515 PMC: 10508916. DOI: 10.18833/spur/6/3/1.


References
1.
Craddock E, Gall J, Jonas M . Hawaiian Drosophila genomes: size variation and evolutionary expansions. Genetica. 2016; 144(1):107-24. DOI: 10.1007/s10709-016-9882-5. View

2.
Patrushev L, Minkevich I . The problem of the eukaryotic genome size. Biochemistry (Mosc). 2009; 73(13):1519-52. DOI: 10.1134/s0006297908130117. View

3.
Serbus L, Casper-Lindley C, Landmann F, Sullivan W . The genetics and cell biology of Wolbachia-host interactions. Annu Rev Genet. 2008; 42:683-707. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130354. View

4.
Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg S . HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods. 2015; 12(4):357-60. PMC: 4655817. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3317. View

5.
Betancourt A, Welch J, Charlesworth B . Reduced effectiveness of selection caused by a lack of recombination. Curr Biol. 2009; 19(8):655-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.039. View