» Articles » PMID: 28664598

Comparison of Fractionation Proteomics for Local SWATH Library Building

Overview
Journal Proteomics
Date 2017 Jul 1
PMID 28664598
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

For data-independent acquisition by means of sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion spectra (SWATH), a reference library of data-dependent acquisition (DDA) runs is typically used to correlate the quantitative data from the fragment ion spectra with peptide identifications. The quality and coverage of such a reference library is therefore essential when processing SWATH data. In general, library sizes can be increased by reducing the impact of DDA precursor selection with replicate runs or fractionation. However, these strategies can affect the match between the library and SWATH measurement, and thus larger library sizes do not necessarily correspond to improved SWATH quantification. Here, three fractionation strategies to increase local library size were compared to standard library building using replicate DDA injection: protein SDS-PAGE fractionation, peptide high-pH RP-HPLC fractionation and MS-acquisition gas phase fractionation. The impact of these libraries on SWATH performance was evaluated in terms of the number of extracted peptides and proteins, the match quality of the peptides and the extraction reproducibility of the transitions. These analyses were conducted using the hydrophilic proteome of differentiating human embryonic stem cells. Our results show that SWATH quantitative results and interpretations are affected by choice of fractionation technique. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD006190.

Citing Articles

Salivary Proteome Is Altered in Children With Small Area Thermal Burns.

Carlton M, Zang T, Parker T, Punyadeera C, Voisey J, Cuttle L Proteomics Clin Appl. 2025; 19(2):e202300107.

PMID: 39895030 PMC: 11895759. DOI: 10.1002/prca.202300107.


Identification Markers Responsible for Differentially Processed Hua by Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Quadruple-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry.

Nie R, Wu C, Zhang X, Deng P Molecules. 2024; 29(7).

PMID: 38611838 PMC: 11013794. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29071559.


Identification of Plasma Biomarkers from Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Using an Optimized Sequential Window Acquisition of All THeoretical Mass Spectra (SWATH) Proteomics Workflow.

Jin L, Wang F, Wang X, Harvey B, Bi Y, Hu C Proteomes. 2023; 11(4).

PMID: 37873874 PMC: 10594463. DOI: 10.3390/proteomes11040032.


Serum Proteomic Analysis Identifies SAA1, FGA, SAP, and CETP as New Biomarkers for Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis.

Xiao J, Lu S, Wang X, Liang M, Dong C, Zhang X Front Immunol. 2022; 13:866035.

PMID: 35757752 PMC: 9226334. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.866035.


SWATH Based Quantitative Proteomics Reveals Significant Lipid Metabolism in Early Myopic Guinea Pig Retina.

Bian J, Sze Y, Tse D, To C, McFadden S, Lam C Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(9).

PMID: 33946922 PMC: 8124159. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22094721.


References
1.
Li S, Cao Q, Xiao W, Guo Y, Yang Y, Duan X . Optimization of Acquisition and Data-Processing Parameters for Improved Proteomic Quantification by Sequential Window Acquisition of All Theoretical Fragment Ion Mass Spectrometry. J Proteome Res. 2016; 16(2):738-747. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00767. View

2.
Manadas B, Mendes V, English J, Dunn M . Peptide fractionation in proteomics approaches. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2010; 7(5):655-63. DOI: 10.1586/epr.10.46. View

3.
Bodzon-Kulakowska A, Bierczynska-Krzysik A, Dylag T, Drabik A, Suder P, Noga M . Methods for samples preparation in proteomic research. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2006; 849(1-2):1-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.10.040. View

4.
Bantscheff M, Lemeer S, Savitski M, Kuster B . Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: critical review update from 2007 to the present. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012; 404(4):939-65. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-012-6203-4. View

5.
Wei Y, Tenzen T, Ji H . Joint analysis of differential gene expression in multiple studies using correlation motifs. Biostatistics. 2014; 16(1):31-46. PMC: 4263229. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxu038. View