» Articles » PMID: 28654366

Quantitative Assessment of Early [F]Sodium Fluoride Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Response to Treatment in Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer to Bone

Overview
Journal J Clin Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2017 Jun 28
PMID 28654366
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose [F]Sodium fluoride (NaF) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is a promising radiotracer for quantitative assessment of bone metastases. This study assesses changes in early NaF PET/CT response measures in metastatic prostate cancer for correlation to clinical outcomes. Patients and Methods Fifty-six patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with osseous metastases had NaF PET/CT scans performed at baseline and after three cycles of chemotherapy (n = 16) or androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (n = 40). A novel technology, Quantitative Total Bone Imaging, was used for analysis. Global imaging metrics, including maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) and total functional burden (SUV), were extracted from composite lesion-level statistics for each patient and tracked throughout treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated as a composite end point of progressive events using conventional imaging and/or physician discretion of clinical benefit; NaF imaging was not used for clinical evaluation. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were conducted between imaging metrics and PFS. Results Functional burden (SUV) assessed midtreatment was the strongest univariable PFS predictor (hazard ratio, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.44 to 2.71; P < .001). Classification of patients based on changes in functional burden showed stronger correlation to PFS than did the change in number of lesions. Various global imaging metrics outperformed baseline clinical markers in predicting outcome, including SUV and SUV. No differences in imaging response or PFS correlates were found for different treatment cohorts. Conclusion Quantitative total bone imaging enables comprehensive disease quantification on NaF PET/CT imaging, showing strong correlation to clinical outcomes. Total functional burden assessed after three cycles of hormonal therapy or chemotherapy was predictive of PFS for men with mCRPC. This supports ongoing development of NaF PET/CT-based imaging biomarkers in mCRPC to bone.

Citing Articles

Quantitative evaluation of lesion response heterogeneity for superior prognostication of clinical outcome.

Lokre O, Perk T, Weisman A, Munian Govindan R, Chen S, Chen M Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 51(12):3505-3517.

PMID: 38819668 PMC: 11445285. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06764-0.


Performance of an automated registration-based method for longitudinal lesion matching and comparison to inter-reader variability.

Huff D, Santoro-Fernandes V, Chen S, Chen M, Kashuk C, Weisman A Phys Med Biol. 2023; 68(17).

PMID: 37567220 PMC: 10461173. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acef8f.


Automated quantification of PET/CT skeletal tumor burden in prostate cancer using artificial intelligence: The PET index.

Lindgren Belal S, Larsson M, Holm J, Buch-Olsen K, Sorensen J, Bjartell A Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023; 50(5):1510-1520.

PMID: 36650356 PMC: 10027829. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06108-4.


Current and future targeted alpha particle therapies for osteosarcoma: Radium-223, actinium-225, and thorium-227.

Anderson P, Subbiah V, Trucco M Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:1030094.

PMID: 36457575 PMC: 9705365. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1030094.


The value of F-NaF PET/CT in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma using visual and quantitative analyses.

Wang D, Li H, Guo C, Huang S, Guo X, Xiao J Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10:949480.

PMID: 36091460 PMC: 9449352. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.949480.


References
1.
Muzahir S, Jeraj R, Liu G, Hall L, Rio A, Perk T . Differentiation of metastatic vs degenerative joint disease using semi-quantitative analysis with (18)F-NaF PET/CT in castrate resistant prostate cancer patients. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015; 5(2):162-8. PMC: 4396008. View

2.
Wondergem M, van der Zant F, van der Ploeg T, Knol R . A literature review of 18F-fluoride PET/CT and 18F-choline or 11C-choline PET/CT for detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2013; 34(10):935-45. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e328364918a. View

3.
Therasse P, Arbuck S, Eisenhauer E, Wanders J, Kaplan R, Rubinstein L . New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000; 92(3):205-16. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205. View

4.
Costelloe C, Chuang H, Madewell J, Ueno N . Cancer Response Criteria and Bone Metastases: RECIST 1.1, MDA and PERCIST. J Cancer. 2010; 1:80-92. PMC: 2938069. DOI: 10.7150/jca.1.80. View

5.
Kurdziel K, Shih J, Apolo A, Lindenberg L, Mena E, McKinney Y . The kinetics and reproducibility of 18F-sodium fluoride for oncology using current PET camera technology. J Nucl Med. 2012; 53(8):1175-84. PMC: 3474293. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.111.100883. View