» Articles » PMID: 28593629

Type 2 Diabetes, Adiposity and Cancer Morbidity and Mortality Risk Taking into Account Competing Risk of Noncancer Deaths in a Prospective Cohort Setting

Overview
Journal Int J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2017 Jun 9
PMID 28593629
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and adiposity associate with increased risk of several cancers, but the impact of competing risk of noncancer deaths on these associations is not known. We prospectively examined participants in the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study aged 44-73 years with no history of cancer at baseline (n = 26,953, 43% men). T2D was ascertained at baseline and during follow-up, and body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) at baseline. Multivariable cause-specific hazard ratios (HR) and subdistribution hazard ratios (sHR), taking into account noncancer deaths, were estimated using Cox- and competing risk regression. During follow-up (mean 17 years), 7,061 incident cancers (3,220 obesity-related cancer types) and 2,848 cancer deaths occurred. BMI and WC were associated with increased risk of obesity-related cancer incidence and cancer mortality. In T2D subjects, risk of obesity-related cancer was elevated among men (HR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.12-1.54; sHR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.10-1.52), and cancer mortality among both men and women (HR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.20-1.49; sHR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.16-1.45). There was no elevated actual risk of cancer death in T2D patients with long disease duration (sHR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.83-1.20). There was a significant additive effect of T2D and adiposity on risk of obesity-related cancer and cancer mortality. In conclusion, detection bias may partially explain the increased risk of cancer morbidity among T2D patients. Both excess risk of competing events among patients with T2D and depletion of susceptibles due to earlier cancer detection will lower the actual risk of cancer, particularly with longer diabetes duration and at older ages.

Citing Articles

Trends of primary liver cancer incidence and mortality in the United States: A population-based study over the last four decades.

Adra S, Alabrach Y, Hashem A, Mahmoud A, Khalouf A, El-Khapery A PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0309465.

PMID: 39236039 PMC: 11376511. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309465.


American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.

Blonde L, Umpierrez G, Reddy S, McGill J, Berga S, Bush M Endocr Pract. 2022; 28(10):923-1049.

PMID: 35963508 PMC: 10200071. DOI: 10.1016/j.eprac.2022.08.002.


Weight Changes in Type 2 Diabetes and Cancer Risk: A Latent Class Trajectory Model Study.

Jensen B, Watson C, Geifman N, Baker J, Badrick E, Renehan A Obes Facts. 2021; 15(2):150-159.

PMID: 34903697 PMC: 9021620. DOI: 10.1159/000520200.


Association of Obesity With Survival Outcomes in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Petrelli F, Cortellini A, Indini A, Tomasello G, Ghidini M, Nigro O JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4(3):e213520.

PMID: 33779745 PMC: 8008284. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3520.


Body mass index and cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes: a dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Soltani S, Abdollahi S, Aune D, Jayedi A Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):2479.

PMID: 33510262 PMC: 7844243. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81671-0.


References
1.
Gao C, Patel C, Michailidou K, Peters U, Gong J, Schildkraut J . Mendelian randomization study of adiposity-related traits and risk of breast, ovarian, prostate, lung and colorectal cancer. Int J Epidemiol. 2016; 45(3):896-908. PMC: 6372135. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyw129. View

2.
Johnson J, Bowker S, Richardson K, Marra C . Time-varying incidence of cancer after the onset of type 2 diabetes: evidence of potential detection bias. Diabetologia. 2011; 54(9):2263-71. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-011-2242-1. View

3.
Berglund G, Nilsson P, Eriksson K, Nilsson J, Hedblad B, Kristenson H . Long-term outcome of the Malmö preventive project: mortality and cardiovascular morbidity. J Intern Med. 2000; 247(1):19-29. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2000.00568.x. View

4.
Lesko C, Lau B . Bias Due to Confounders for the Exposure-Competing Risk Relationship. Epidemiology. 2016; 28(1):20-27. PMC: 5489237. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000565. View

5.
Danaei G, Tavakkoli M, Hernan M . Bias in observational studies of prevalent users: lessons for comparative effectiveness research from a meta-analysis of statins. Am J Epidemiol. 2012; 175(4):250-62. PMC: 3271813. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr301. View