» Articles » PMID: 28587977

Combination of Straight and Tilted Implants for Supporting Screw-retained Dental Prostheses in Atrophic Posterior Maxillae: A 2-year Prospective Study

Overview
Journal J Dent
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2017 Jun 8
PMID 28587977
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the two-year survival rate (SR) and marginal bone loss (MBL) of fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) supported by straight (S) and tilted (T) implants under the influence of diverse study variables.

Methods: A prospective investigation comprising 21 patients provided with a total of 27 maxillary screw-retained restorations fixed to 70 dental implants was developed. Two groups of implants were considered depending on their inclination with respect to the occlusal plane: Group 1 (S, n=37): straight/axial implants and Group 2 (T, n=33): tilted/angled fixations. Each FDP was supported by a combination of S and T implants. SR and MBL were assessed at the time of loading and two years after surgery. Patient-, surgical- and/or rehabilitation-related information was gathered. Data were statistically analysed at the α=0.05 significance level.

Results: After 24 months, a 100% SR was achieved and the MBL of S and T implants were statistically similar. T implants located in the molar region showed lower MBL than did those replacing premolars (p=0.031).

Conclusions: Upright and angled fixations inserted at posterior maxillary areas resulted in comparable survival rates and peri-implant MBL after two years. The marginal bone resorption around tilted implants depended on their location.

Clinical Significance: Screw-retained restorations fixed to straight and tilted implants seem to be a safe treatment option in posterior atrophic maxillae.

Citing Articles

Analysis of ultra-short implants with different angulations: a retrospective case-control study with 2 to 9 years of follow-up.

Malchiodi L, Fiorino A, Merlino L, Cucchi A, Zotti F, Nocini P Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(1):79.

PMID: 38183469 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05460-x.


Clinical decision and related factors influencing implant direction in the esthetic area.

Liu Y, Yuan Q Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023; 41(5):512-520.

PMID: 37805675 PMC: 10580232. DOI: 10.7518/hxkq.2023.2023151.


Immediate Maxillary Full-Arch Rehabilitation of Periodontal Patients with Terminal Dentition Using Tilted Implants and Bone Augmentation: A 5-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.

Slutzkey G, Cohen O, Chaushu L, Rahmanov A, Mijiritsky E, Beitlitum I J Clin Med. 2022; 11(10).

PMID: 35629027 PMC: 9147479. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11102902.


Long-Term Comparison of Survival and Marginal Bone of Implants with and without Sinus Augmentation in Maxillary Molars within the Same Patients: A 5.8- to 22-Year Retrospective Study.

Park W, Han J, Kang K J Clin Med. 2021; 10(7).

PMID: 33806214 PMC: 8036778. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10071360.


[Development of tilted implant for free end of maxillary posterior teeth].

Xin X, Cai Q, Wang H, Zhou Y Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020; 38(1):86-89.

PMID: 32037772 PMC: 7184296. DOI: 10.7518/hxkq.2020.01.015.