Long-Term Comparison of Survival and Marginal Bone of Implants with and Without Sinus Augmentation in Maxillary Molars Within the Same Patients: A 5.8- to 22-Year Retrospective Study

Overview

Journal J Clin Med

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2021 Apr 3

PMID 33806214

Citations 5

Authors

Won-Bae Park

Ji-Young Han

Kyung-Lhi Kang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) is widely used and considered a predictable procedure for implant placement. However, the influence of MSFA on implant survival and marginal bone loss (MBL) is still inconclusive. The purpose of this retrospective observational study is to evaluate the long-term genuine influence of MSFA on the survival and MBL of implants by comparing those with and without MSFA only in maxillary molars within the same patients. Thirty-eight patients (28 male and 10 female), with a total of 119 implants, received implants with and without MSFA, and were followed up for 5.8 to 22 years. Patient- and implant-related factors were assessed with a frailty model for implant survival and with generalized estimation equations (GEE) for MBL around the implant. No variables showed a statistical significance for implant failure in the frailty model. In GEE analysis for MBL, MSFA did not show any statistical significance. In conclusion, MSFA demonstrated no significant influence on implant failure and MBL in posterior maxilla in this study.

Citing Articles

Long-Term Volumetric Stability of Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation Using a Xenograft Bone Substitute and Its Combination with Autologous Bone: A 6+ Year Retrospective Follow-Up Study Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

Zamure-Damberga L, Radzins O, Salms G, Zolovs M, Bokvalde Z, Neimane L Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(5).

PMID: 38786519 PMC: 11119141. DOI: 10.3390/dj12050121.

A Comprehensive Clinical Review of Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation in Patients with Well-Defined Faintly Radiopaque Lesions in the Antrum.

Nosaka Y, Nosaka H, Munakata M, Sanda M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(2).

PMID: 38256466 PMC: 10816520. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020332.

Comparison of sinusitis rate after sinus lift procedure and zygomatic implant surgery: a meta-analysis.

Rocha R, Vianna C, Trojan L, Padovan L, Dos Santos M Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023; 28(1):63-77.

PMID: 37266797 DOI: 10.1007/s10006-023-01159-1.

Effectiveness of ultra-wide implants in the mandibular and maxillary posterior areas: a 5-year retrospective clinical study.

Kim S, Kim H, Yun P, Kim Y J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023; 49(1):13-20.

PMID: 36859371 PMC: 9985996. DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2023.49.1.13.

Long-Term Clinical Study of Implants Placed in Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation Using Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate.

Velasco-Ortega E, Sierra-Baztan A, Jimenez-Guerra A, Espana-Lopez A, Ortiz-Garcia I, Nunez-Marquez E Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(19).

PMID: 34639277 PMC: 8508221. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18199975.

References

Sesma N, Pannuti C, Cardaropoli G . Retrospective clinical study of 988 dual acid-etched implants placed in grafted and native bone for single-tooth replacement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012; 27(5):1243-8. View

Sbordone C, Toti P, Ramaglia L, Guidetti F, Sbordone L, Martuscelli R . A 5-year clinical and computerized tomographic implant follow-up in sinus-lifted maxillae and native bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 25(9):1056-64. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12222. View

Wallace S, Froum S . Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol. 2004; 8(1):328-43. DOI: 10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.328. View

Taschieri S, Lolato A, Testori T, Francetti L, Fabbro M . Short dental implants as compared to maxillary sinus augmentation procedure for the rehabilitation of edentulous posterior maxilla: Three-year results of a randomized clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017; 20(1):9-20. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12563. View

Pohl V, Thoma D, Sporniak-Tutak K, Garcia-Garcia A, Taylor T, Haas R . Short dental implants (6 mm) versus long dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 3-year results from a multicentre, randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2017; 44(4):438-445. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12694. View

Esposito M, Felice P, Worthington H . Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (5):CD008397. PMC: 10821778. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008397.pub2. View

Pjetursson B, Tan W, Zwahlen M, Lang N . A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35(8 Suppl):216-40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01272.x. View

Anitua E, Alkhraisat M . 15-year follow-up of short dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient: Mandible Vs maxilla. Ann Anat. 2018; 222:88-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2018.11.003. View

Thoma D, Maggetti I, Waller T, Hammerle C, Jung R . Clinical and patient-reported outcomes of implants placed in autogenous bone grafts and implants placed in native bone: A case-control study with a follow-up of 5-16 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019; 30(3):242-251. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13410. View

10.

Guven S, Cabbar F, Guler N . Local and systemic factors associated with marginal bone loss around dental implants: a retrospective clinical study. Quintessence Int. 2020; 51(2):128-141. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a42950. View

11.

Huynh-Ba G, Friedberg J, Vogiatzi D, Ioannidou E . Implant failure predictors in the posterior maxilla: a retrospective study of 273 consecutive implants. J Periodontol. 2008; 79(12):2256-61. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2008.070602. View

12.

Park W, Kang K, Han J . Factors influencing long-term survival rates of implants placed simultaneously with lateral maxillary sinus floor augmentation: A 6- to 20-year retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019; 30(10):977-988. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13505. View

13.

Jones C . Chlorhexidine: is it still the gold standard?. Periodontol 2000. 1998; 15:55-62. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1997.tb00105.x. View

14.

Zeger S, Liang K . Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics. 1986; 42(1):121-30. View

15.

Galindo-Moreno P, Fernandez-Jimenez A, Avila-Ortiz G, Silvestre F, Hernandez-Cortes P, Wang H . Marginal bone loss around implants placed in maxillary native bone or grafted sinuses: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 25(3):378-384. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12122. View

16.

Schlegel A, Hamel J, Wichmann M, Eitner S . Comparative clinical results after implant placement in the posterior maxilla with and without sinus augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23(2):289-98. View

17.

Shintani A . Primer of statistics in dental research: Part II. J Prosthodont Res. 2014; 58(2):85-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2014.03.003. View

18.

Vinci R, Tete G, Lucchetti F, Cappare P, Gherlone E . Implant survival rate in calvarial bone grafts: A retrospective clinical study with 10 year follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019; 21(4):662-668. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12799. View

19.

French D, Larjava H, Ofec R . Retrospective cohort study of 4591 Straumann implants in private practice setting, with up to 10-year follow-up. Part 1: multivariate survival analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 26(11):1345-54. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12463. View

20.

Romero-Millan J J, Aizcorbe-Vicente J, Penarrocha-Diago M, Galindo-Moreno P, Canullo L, Penarrocha-Oltra D . Implants in the Posterior Maxilla: Open Sinus Lift Versus Conventional Implant Placement. A Systematic Review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019; 34(4):e65–e76. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.7274. View