[Development of Tilted Implant for Free End of Maxillary Posterior Teeth]

Overview

Journal Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2020 Feb 11

PMID 32037772

Authors

Xi-Rui Xin

Qing Cai

Han-Chi Wang

Yan-Min Zhou

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Vertical bone insufficiency in the maxillary posterior teeth is a common clinical situation. At present, the bone insufficiency in the maxillary posterior teeth is mainly overcome by bone grafting through maxillary sinus floor elevation. Compared with traditional axial implantation, tilted implantation can better avoid bone grafting, reduce complications, shorten the treatment cycle, reduce the treatment cost for patients, and gradually be promoted in clinical settings. This article reviews the concept, biomechanics, clinical evaluation, and digital trend of tilted implants of maxillary posterior teeth.

References

Huang J . [Risk factors and strategies of dental implants in the maxillary posterior without sufficient bone available]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012; 30(1):1-9. View

Pommer B, Mailath-Pokorny G, Haas R, Busenlechner D, Furhauser R, Watzek G . Patients' preferences towards minimally invasive treatment alternatives for implant rehabilitation of edentulous jaws. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014; 7 Suppl 2:S91-109. View

Bellini C, Romeo D, Galbusera F, Agliardi E, Pietrabissa R, Zampelis A . A finite element analysis of tilted versus nontilted implant configurations in the edentulous maxilla. Int J Prosthodont. 2009; 22(2):155-7. View

Ho C, Jovanovic S . The "All-on-4" concept for implant rehabilitation of an edentulous jaw. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2014; 35(4):255-9. View

Jo K, Yoon K, Cheong J, Jeon I . Postoperative perforation of the Schneiderian membrane in maxillary sinus augmentation: a case report. J Oral Implantol. 2014; 40 Spec No:375-9. DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00201. View

Zhang Y, Chen B . [The complications, prevention and treatment of sinus floor elevation through lateral window approach]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018; 53(2):129-132. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2018.02.014. View

Asawa N, Bulbule N, Kakade D, Shah R . Angulated implants: an alternative to bone augmentation and sinus lift procedure: systematic review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9(3):ZE10-3. PMC: 4413168. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11368.5655. View

Zhu B, Gao P, Liang X . [3-Dimensional finite element analysis of single implant-supported prosthesis with three different occlusal designs]. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2005; 22(3):494-6. View

Malo P, Rangert B, Nobre M . "All-on-Four" immediate-function concept with Brånemark System implants for completely edentulous mandibles: a retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003; 5 Suppl 1:2-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00010.x. View

10.

Calandriello R, Tomatis M . Simplified treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla via immediate/early function and tilted implants: A prospective 1-year clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005; 7 Suppl 1:S1-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00069.x. View

11.

Felice P, Pistilli R, Piattelli M, Soardi E, Barausse C, Esposito M . 1-stage versus 2-stage lateral sinus lift procedures: 1-year post-loading results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014; 7(1):65-75. View

12.

Saleh Saber F, Ghasemi S, Koodaryan R, Babaloo A, Abolfazli N . The Comparison of Stress Distribution with Different Implant Numbers and Inclination Angles In All-on-four and Conventional Methods in Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2016; 9(4):246-53. PMC: 4753034. DOI: 10.15171/joddd.2015.044. View

13.

Pozzi A, Sannino G, Barlattani A . Minimally invasive treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla: a proof-of-concept prospective study with a follow-up of between 36 and 54 months. J Prosthet Dent. 2012; 108(5):286-97. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60178-4. View

14.

Agliardi E, Romeo D, Wenger A, Gastaldi G, Gherlone E . Immediate rehabilitation of the posterior maxilla with extensive sinus pneumatization with one axial and one trans-sinus tilted implant: a 3-year clinical report and a classification. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 113(3):163-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.07.017. View

15.

de Paula G, Silva G, Vilaca E, Cornacchia T, de Magalhaes C, Moreira A . Biomechanical Behavior of Tooth-Implant Supported Prostheses With Different Implant Connections: A Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis. Implant Dent. 2018; 27(3):294-302. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000737. View

16.

Geng W, Liu C, Su Y, Li J, Zhou Y . Accuracy of different types of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing surgical guides for dental implant placement. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015; 8(6):8442-9. PMC: 4538014. View

17.

Casar-Espinosa J, Castillo-Oyague R, Serrera-Figallo M, Garrido-Serrano R, Lynch C, Menendez-Collar M . Combination of straight and tilted implants for supporting screw-retained dental prostheses in atrophic posterior maxillae: A 2-year prospective study. J Dent. 2017; 63:85-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.05.022. View

18.

Sannino G . All-on-4 concept: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. J Oral Implantol. 2013; 41(2):163-71. DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00312. View

19.

Pigache P, Anavekar N, Raoul G, Ferri J . Maxillary Reconstruction for Sinus Lift Complications With Oro-Antral Fistula: The Le Fort I Approach. J Craniofac Surg. 2016; 27(2):464-8. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002383. View

20.

Chrcanovic B, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A . Tilted versus axially placed dental implants: a meta-analysis. J Dent. 2014; 43(2):149-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.09.002. View