» Articles » PMID: 28547206

Glycemic Variability in Type 1 Diabetes Compared with Degludec and Glargine on the Morning Injection: An Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal Diabetes Ther
Date 2017 May 27
PMID 28547206
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Optimal adjustment of basal insulin to overcome hypoglycemia and glycemic variability (GV) depends on its duration of action and peak-less profile. Owing to the ability of long-acting basal insulin to avoid hypoglycemia, we titrated pre-meal glucose to normal fasting blood glucose, 80-110 mg/dL (4.5-6.1 mmol/L), and post-meal glucose to 80-140 mg/dL (4.5-7.8 mmol/L). The purpose of this study was to evaluate two basal insulin analogues degludec (IDeg) and glargine (IGlar), injected in the morning, for GV using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in type 1 diabetes (T1DM).

Methods: In this crossover study, 20 Japanese patients with T1DM (age 54 ± 16 years, disease duration 16 ± 8 years, BMI 24 ± 4 kg/m, HbA1c 7.4 ± 0.8%) were randomized into one of two different starting regimens, and CGM was conducted on three consecutive days during the last week of each 12-week titration period. Treatment satisfaction was assessed at the end of each treatment period using the Diabetes Therapy-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (DTR-QOL).

Results: There were no differences in HbA1c, total insulin dosage, body weight changes, and basal to bolus ratio between the IDeg and IGlar arms. The day-to-day variability in fasting interstitial GV on the CGM curves was significantly less in the IDeg than IGlar treatment period (25.9 ± 22.0 vs. 43.8 ± 30.1 mg/dl, p = 0.04). Other markers of GV, calculated by the EasyGV software, including mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), J-index, total and nocturnal hypoglycemia were not different between the two treatment periods. The score of "satisfaction with treatment", a subdomain of the DTR-QOL system, was higher in the IDeg period.

Conclusion: Thus, the morning injection of the two long-acting insulin analogues seemed similar with regard to the magnitude of hypoglycemia in T1DM, but treatment with IDeg was associated with lower day-to-day variation in glucose level. These results suggest that IDeg is safe with minimal morning GV in patients with T1DM.

Clinical Trial Registration: Japanese Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000012358.

Citing Articles

Effects of insulin glargine U300 versus insulin degludec U100 on glycemic variability, hypoglycemia, and diet evaluated by continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Tsai P, Lin C, Huang Y, Chen H, Lin Y Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2024; 40(12):1086-1094.

PMID: 39588847 PMC: 11618557. DOI: 10.1002/kjm2.12909.


Insulin Glargine in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Review of Clinical Trials and Real-world Evidence Across Two Decades.

Saboo B, Chandalia H, Ghosh S, Kesavadev J, Kochar I, Prasannakumar K Curr Diabetes Rev. 2023; 20(1):e100323214554.

PMID: 36896906 PMC: 10909813. DOI: 10.2174/1573399819666230310150905.


The efficacy of insulin degludec and insulin glargine over NPH insulin among toddlers and preschoolers with type 1 diabetes using glycemic variability and time in range.

Elhabashy S, Sakr E, Salah N Eur J Pediatr. 2023; 182(4):1857-1868.

PMID: 36800034 PMC: 10167161. DOI: 10.1007/s00431-023-04857-w.


Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine on Glycemic Variability in Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Yang Y, Long C, Li T, Chen Q Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022; 13:890090.

PMID: 35721710 PMC: 9204495. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.890090.


Perspectives of glycemic variability in diabetic neuropathy: a comprehensive review.

Zhang X, Yang X, Sun B, Zhu C Commun Biol. 2021; 4(1):1366.

PMID: 34876671 PMC: 8651799. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-021-02896-3.


References
1.
Heise T, Nosek L, Bottcher S, Hastrup H, Haahr H . Ultra-long-acting insulin degludec has a flat and stable glucose-lowering effect in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012; 14(10):944-50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01638.x. View

2.
Bergenstal R, Rosenstock J, Bastyr 3rd E, Prince M, Qu Y, Jacober S . Lower glucose variability and hypoglycemia measured by continuous glucose monitoring with novel long-acting insulin LY2605541 versus insulin glargine. Diabetes Care. 2013; 37(3):659-65. DOI: 10.2337/dc12-2621. View

3.
Diggs-Andrews K, Zhang X, Song Z, Daphna-Iken D, Routh V, Fisher S . Brain insulin action regulates hypothalamic glucose sensing and the counterregulatory response to hypoglycemia. Diabetes. 2010; 59(9):2271-80. PMC: 2927950. DOI: 10.2337/db10-0401. View

4.
Jonassen I, Havelund S, Hoeg-Jensen T, Steensgaard D, Wahlund P, Ribel U . Design of the novel protraction mechanism of insulin degludec, an ultra-long-acting basal insulin. Pharm Res. 2012; 29(8):2104-14. PMC: 3399081. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-012-0739-z. View

5.
Chan C, Pyle L, Newnes L, Nadeau K, Zeitler P, Kelsey M . Continuous glucose monitoring and its relationship to hemoglobin A1c and oral glucose tolerance testing in obese and prediabetic youth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 100(3):902-10. PMC: 4333034. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2014-3612. View