» Articles » PMID: 28498810

The Prognostic Value of GLUT1 in Cancers: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Oncotarget
Specialty Oncology
Date 2017 May 13
PMID 28498810
Citations 81
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Increased glycolysis is one of the hallmarks of cancer. The abnormal expression of glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) was reported to be associated with resistance to current therapy and poor prognosis. Numerous studies have investigated the correlation between GLUT1 expression and prognosis in cancers, but the conclusions are still controversial. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to explore the association between GLUT1 and survival in human cancers. PubMed, Springer, Medline, and Cochrane Library were searched carefully to identify eligible studies evaluating prognostic value of GLUT1 in cancers. Twenty-seven studies with 4079 patients were included in the present study. Our pooled results identified that increased expression of GLUT1 was associated with unfavorable overall survival (HR = 1.780, 95% CI = 1.574-.013, p < 0.001)) and poorer disease-free survival (HR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.229-3.095, p = 0.003). Furthermore, overexpression of GLUT1 linked with poor differentiated tumors (RR = 1.380, 95% CI = 1.086-1.755, p = 0.009; I2 = 72.0%, p < 0.001), positive lymph node metastasis (RR = 1.395, 95% CI = 1.082-1.799, p = 0.010; I2 = 70.8%, p = 0.002) and larger tumor size (RR = 1.405, 95% CI = 1.231-1.603, p < 0.001; I2 = 37.3%, p = 0.093). This systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that the GLUT1 may serve as an ideal prognostic biomarker in various cancers.

Citing Articles

Association between individual Warburg-related proteins and prognosis in colorectal cancer.

Offermans K, Jenniskens J, Simons C, Samarska I, Fazzi G, Smits K J Pathol Clin Res. 2025; 11(2):e70016.

PMID: 40017054 PMC: 11868443. DOI: 10.1002/2056-4538.70016.


Metabolic reprogramming in the pathogenesis and progression of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications.

Wang H, Hu J, Zhou W, Qian A Am J Cancer Res. 2024; 14(8):4049-4064.

PMID: 39267663 PMC: 11387871. DOI: 10.62347/VYAT9271.


Impact of genetic variants in the solute carrier () genes encoding drug uptake transporters on the response to anticancer chemotherapy.

Marin J, Serrano M, Herraez E, Lozano E, Ortiz-Rivero S, Perez-Silva L Cancer Drug Resist. 2024; 7:27.

PMID: 39143954 PMC: 11322974. DOI: 10.20517/cdr.2024.42.


Nitric oxide has diverse effects on head and neck cancer cell proliferation and glycolysis.

Kokilakanit P, Koontongkaew S, Utispan K Biomed Rep. 2024; 21(1):106.

PMID: 38868526 PMC: 11168032. DOI: 10.3892/br.2024.1794.


The regulatory roles and clinical significance of glycolysis in tumor.

Qiao Q, Hu S, Wang X Cancer Commun (Lond). 2024; 44(7):761-786.

PMID: 38851859 PMC: 11260772. DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12549.


References
1.
Ramani P, Headford A, May M . GLUT1 protein expression correlates with unfavourable histologic category and high risk in patients with neuroblastic tumours. Virchows Arch. 2013; 462(2):203-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00428-012-1370-4. View

2.
Yang J, Wen J, Tian T, Lu Z, Wang Y, Wang Z . GLUT-1 overexpression as an unfavorable prognostic biomarker in patients with colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2017; 8(7):11788-11796. PMC: 5355304. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.14352. View

3.
Tierney J, Stewart L, Ghersi D, Burdett S, Sydes M . Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials. 2007; 8:16. PMC: 1920534. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-8-16. View

4.
Andersen S, Eilertsen M, Donnem T, Al-Shibli K, Al-Saad S, Busund L . Diverging prognostic impacts of hypoxic markers according to NSCLC histology. Lung Cancer. 2010; 72(3):294-302. DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.10.006. View

5.
Jang S, Han H, Jang K, Jun Y, Jang S, Min K . The Glycolytic Phenotype is Correlated with Aggressiveness and Poor Prognosis in Invasive Ductal Carcinomas. J Breast Cancer. 2012; 15(2):172-80. PMC: 3395740. DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.2.172. View