» Articles » PMID: 38114977

Association Between Glycolysis Markers and Prognosis of Liver Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2023 Dec 20
PMID 38114977
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In recent years, the capacity of tumor cells to maintain high levels of glycolysis, even in the presence of oxygen, has emerged as one of the main metabolic traits and garnered considerable attention. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to investigate the prognostic value of glycolysis markers in liver cancer.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles on glycolytic marker expression levels associated with the prognosis of liver cancer until April 2023. Stata SE14.0 was used to calculate the aggregate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Thirty-five studies were included. The worse overall survival (OS) (P < 0.001), disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.001), recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.004), and time to recurrence (TTR) (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with elevated expression of glycolysis markers. Higher expression of PKM2 (P < 0.001), STMN1 (P = 0.002), MCT4 (P < 0.001), GLUT1 (P = 0.025), HK-2 (P < 0.001), and CA9 (P < 0.001) were significantly related to shorter OS. Increased levels of PKM2 (P < 0.001), CA9 (P = 0.005), and MCT4 (P < 0.001) were associated with worse DFS. Elevated PKM2 expression (P = 0.002) was also associated with poorer RFS in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. GLUT2 expression was not correlated with the prognosis of liver cancer (P = 0.134).

Conclusions: Elevated expression of glycolysis markers was associated with worse OS, DFS, RFS, and TTR in patients with liver cancer. Therefore, these glycolysis markers could serve as potential prognostic markers and therapeutic targets in liver cancer.

Trial Registration: PROSPERO registration: CRD42023469645.

Citing Articles

Tracking fructose 1,6-bisphosphate dynamics in liver cancer cells using a fluorescent biosensor.

Perez-Chavez I, Koberstein J, Malo Pueyo J, Gilglioni E, Vertommen D, Baeyens N iScience. 2024; 27(12):111336.

PMID: 39640569 PMC: 11617404. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111336.


Diagnostic lncRNA high expression for liver patients prognosis and medication guidance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhu H, Chen H, Zhu X, Zhang B, Jin C Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1462512.

PMID: 39211780 PMC: 11357924. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1462512.


Identification of vitamin D-related signature for predicting the clinical outcome and immunotherapy response in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Wang T, Han L, Xu J, Guo B Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(19):e37998.

PMID: 38728505 PMC: 11081612. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037998.

References
1.
Lis P, Dylag M, Niedzwiecka K, Ko Y, Pedersen P, Goffeau A . The HK2 Dependent "Warburg Effect" and Mitochondrial Oxidative Phosphorylation in Cancer: Targets for Effective Therapy with 3-Bromopyruvate. Molecules. 2016; 21(12). PMC: 6273842. DOI: 10.3390/molecules21121730. View

2.
Avril N, Menzel M, Dose J, Schelling M, Weber W, Janicke F . Glucose metabolism of breast cancer assessed by 18F-FDG PET: histologic and immunohistochemical tissue analysis. J Nucl Med. 2001; 42(1):9-16. View

3.
Huang Y, Xian L, Liu Z, Wei L, Qin L, Xiong Y . AMPKα2/HNF4A/BORIS/GLUT4 pathway promotes hepatocellular carcinoma cell invasion and metastasis in low glucose microenviroment. Biochem Pharmacol. 2022; 203:115198. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2022.115198. View

4.
Sohn W, Lee H, Lee S, Lim J, Lee M, Park C . Obesity and the risk of primary liver cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2020; 27(1):157-174. PMC: 7820201. DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2020.0176. View

5.
Iansante V, Choy P, Fung S, Liu Y, Chai J, Dyson J . PARP14 promotes the Warburg effect in hepatocellular carcinoma by inhibiting JNK1-dependent PKM2 phosphorylation and activation. Nat Commun. 2015; 6:7882. PMC: 4918319. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8882. View