» Articles » PMID: 28471217

Number Prompts Left-to-right Spatial Mapping in Toddlerhood

Overview
Journal Dev Psychol
Specialties Pediatrics
Psychology
Date 2017 May 5
PMID 28471217
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Toddlers performed a spatial mapping task in which they were required to learn the location of a hidden object in a vertical array and then transpose this location information 90° to a horizontal array. During the vertical training, they were given (a) no labels, (b) alphabetical labels, or (c) numerical labels for each potential spatial location. After the array was transposed to become a horizontal continuum, the children who were provided with numerical labels during training and those who heard alphabetical labels and formed a strong memory for the vertical location, selectively chose the location corresponding to a left-to-right mapping bias. Children who received no concurrent ordinal labels during training were not able to transpose the array, and did not exhibit any spatial directionality bias after transposition. These results indicate that children exhibit more flexible spatial mapping than other animals, and this mapping is modulated depending on the type of concurrent ordinal information the child receives. (PsycINFO Database Record

Citing Articles

Ordinality and Verbal Framing Influence Preschoolers' Memory for Spatial Structure.

Branyan H, Fridman E, Shaki S, McCrink K J Cogn Dev. 2023; 24(1):142-159.

PMID: 36968949 PMC: 10038218. DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2022.2144318.


More linear than log? Non-symbolic number-line estimation in 3- to 5-year-old children.

Haman M, Patro K Front Psychol. 2022; 13:1003696.

PMID: 36389566 PMC: 9659870. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1003696.


Eye Tracking Lateralized Spatial Associations in Early Childhood.

West E, McCrink K J Cogn Dev. 2022; 22(5):678-694.

PMID: 35330699 PMC: 8942349. DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2021.1926254.


Spatial Presentations, but Not Response Formats Influence Spatial-Numerical Associations in Adults.

Fischer U, Huber S, Nuerk H, Cress U, Moeller K Front Psychol. 2019; 9:2608.

PMID: 30619009 PMC: 6305423. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02608.


From Innate Spatial Biases to Enculturated Spatial Cognition: The Case of Spatial Associations in Number and Other Sequences.

McCrink K, de Hevia M Front Psychol. 2018; 9:415.

PMID: 29651264 PMC: 5885251. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00415.


References
1.
Kamawar D, LeFevre J, Bisanz J, Fast L, Skwarchuk S, Smith-Chant B . Knowledge of counting principles: how relevant is order irrelevance?. J Exp Child Psychol. 2009; 105(1-2):138-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.08.004. View

2.
Jones S . Imitation in infancy: the development of mimicry. Psychol Sci. 2007; 18(7):593-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01945.x. View

3.
de Hevia M, Vanderslice M, Spelke E . Cross-dimensional mapping of number, length and brightness by preschool children. PLoS One. 2012; 7(4):e35530. PMC: 3334896. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035530. View

4.
Rusconi E, Kwan B, Giordano B, Umilta C, Butterworth B . Spatial representation of pitch height: the SMARC effect. Cognition. 2005; 99(2):113-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.004. View

5.
Patro K, Fischer U, Nuerk H, Cress U . How to rapidly construct a spatial-numerical representation in preliterate children (at least temporarily). Dev Sci. 2015; 19(1):126-44. DOI: 10.1111/desc.12296. View