» Articles » PMID: 24802083

Human Infants' Preference for Left-to-right Oriented Increasing Numerical Sequences

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 May 8
PMID 24802083
Citations 50
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

While associations between number and space, in the form of a spatially oriented numerical representation, have been extensively reported in human adults, the origins of this phenomenon are still poorly understood. The commonly accepted view is that this number-space association is a product of human invention, with accounts proposing that culture, symbolic knowledge, and mathematics education are at the roots of this phenomenon. Here we show that preverbal infants aged 7 months, who lack symbolic knowledge and mathematics education, show a preference for increasing magnitude displayed in a left-to-right spatial orientation. Infants habituated to left-to-right oriented increasing or decreasing numerical sequences showed an overall higher looking time to new left-to-right oriented increasing numerical sequences at test (Experiment 1). This pattern did not hold when infants were presented with the same ordinal numerical information displayed from right to left (Experiment 2). The different pattern of results was congruent with the presence of a malleable, context-dependent baseline preference for increasing, left-to-right oriented, numerosities (Experiment 3). These findings are suggestive of an early predisposition in humans to link numerical order with a left-to-right spatial orientation, which precedes the acquisition of symbolic abilities, mathematics education, and the acquisition of reading and writing skills.

Citing Articles

Does the Brain Care Which Direction We Read? A Cross-Cultural tDCS Study on Functional Lateralization of Number Processing.

Bahreini N, Artemenko C, Plewnia C, Rostami R, Nuerk H Brain Behav. 2025; 15(3):e70353.

PMID: 40059401 PMC: 11891265. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70353.


A left-to-right bias in number-space mapping across ages and cultures.

Eccher E, Josserand M, Caparos S, Boissin E, Buiatti M, Piazza M Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):495.

PMID: 39794321 PMC: 11724025. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-55685-x.


One direction? Cultural aspects of the mental number line beyond reading direction.

Bulut M, Roth L, Bahreini N, Cipora K, Reips U, Nuerk H Psychol Res. 2024; 89(1):37.

PMID: 39710792 PMC: 11663824. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-024-02038-4.


Dichotomous horizontal representation of acute deterioration risk on illnesses.

Hishiya R, Ishihara M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):30258.

PMID: 39632948 PMC: 11618330. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-81592-8.


Event as the central construal of psychological time in humans.

Stojic S, Nadasdy Z Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1402903.

PMID: 39359968 PMC: 11445672. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1402903.


References
1.
Shaki S, Fischer M . Reading space into numbers: a cross-linguistic comparison of the SNARC effect. Cognition. 2008; 108(2):590-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.001. View

2.
McCrink K, Wynn K . Large-number addition and subtraction by 9-month-old infants. Psychol Sci. 2004; 15(11):776-81. DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00755.x. View

3.
van Dijck J, Fias W . A working memory account for spatial-numerical associations. Cognition. 2011; 119(1):114-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.013. View

4.
Gebuis T, Gevers W . Numerosities and space; indeed a cognitive illusion! A reply to de Hevia and Spelke (2009). Cognition. 2011; 121(2):248-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.008. View

5.
Opfer J, Thompson C, Furlong E . Early development of spatial-numeric associations: evidence from spatial and quantitative performance of preschoolers. Dev Sci. 2010; 13(5):761-71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00934.x. View