» Articles » PMID: 35330699

Eye Tracking Lateralized Spatial Associations in Early Childhood

Overview
Journal J Cogn Dev
Publisher Routledge
Date 2022 Mar 25
PMID 35330699
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This experiment tests the age at which left-to-right spatial associations found in infancy shift to culture-specific spatial biases in later childhood, for both numerical and non-numerical information. Children ages 1 to 5 years (N=320) were tested within an eye-tracking paradigm which required passive viewing of a video portraying a spatial transposition. In this video, an item was hidden in a vertical set of locations, which were then surreptitiously rotated 90°. There were several conditions, which varied in the degree to which the locations were presented alongside ordinal (numerical, alphabetical) or non-ordinal (nonsense label) information. After transposition, a narrator prompted the child to visually search the array. The amount of time spent fixating in a location consistent with a left-to-right mapping or a right-to-left mapping was measured to gauge the degree and laterality of spatial associations. Overall, children looked more towards locations consistent with a left-to-right mapping. This effect fluctuated with age, dipping as children entered toddlerhood, increasing in 3- and 4-year-olds, and then disappearing at age 5. The ordinal nature of the stimuli (e.g., numerical or non-numerical) did not influence the laterality of the spatial associations. A follow-up experiment confirms that, like older preschoolers, adults (N=66) also exhibit no spontaneous left-to-right mapping bias in this paradigm, with no fluctuation as a result of condition. These data support the presence of a decrease in left-to-right processing around the age of two, as children recede from infantile spatial biases and progress to exhibiting culture-specific spatial biases in early childhood.

Citing Articles

Dichotomous horizontal representation of acute deterioration risk on illnesses.

Hishiya R, Ishihara M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):30258.

PMID: 39632948 PMC: 11618330. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-81592-8.


Magnitude shifts spatial attention from left to right in rhesus monkeys as in the human mental number line.

Rugani R, Platt M, Zhang Y, Brannon E iScience. 2024; 27(2):108866.

PMID: 38318369 PMC: 10838727. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.108866.


Ordinality and Verbal Framing Influence Preschoolers' Memory for Spatial Structure.

Branyan H, Fridman E, Shaki S, McCrink K J Cogn Dev. 2023; 24(1):142-159.

PMID: 36968949 PMC: 10038218. DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2022.2144318.

References
1.
Lourenco S, Longo M . General magnitude representation in human infants. Psychol Sci. 2010; 21(6):873-81. PMC: 2930776. DOI: 10.1177/0956797610370158. View

2.
de Hevia M, Girelli L, Addabbo M, Macchi Cassia V . Human infants' preference for left-to-right oriented increasing numerical sequences. PLoS One. 2014; 9(5):e96412. PMC: 4011793. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096412. View

3.
Rusconi E, Kwan B, Giordano B, Umilta C, Butterworth B . Spatial representation of pitch height: the SMARC effect. Cognition. 2005; 99(2):113-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.004. View

4.
Previtali P, de Hevia M, Girelli L . Placing order in space: the SNARC effect in serial learning. Exp Brain Res. 2009; 201(3):599-605. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-2063-3. View

5.
McCrink K, de Hevia M . From Innate Spatial Biases to Enculturated Spatial Cognition: The Case of Spatial Associations in Number and Other Sequences. Front Psychol. 2018; 9:415. PMC: 5885251. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00415. View