» Articles » PMID: 28465734

Correlations Between Corneal Biomechanics and Glaucoma Severity in Patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma

Overview
Journal Maedica (Bucur)
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 May 4
PMID 28465734
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the relationship between corneal biomechanical changes and glaucoma severity in primary open angle glaucoma patients.

Design: Correlation study.

Materials And Methods: Our study included 70 glaucomatous eyes; they were divided in groups using Glaucoma Staging System Based on Humphrey Visual Field. Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) was used in order to determine corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF); ultrasonic pachimetry (Ocuscan) to measure central corneal thickness (CCT) and Humphrey Visual Analyser to determine mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD) and visual field index (VFI). For statistical analysis we used descriptive analysis and linear regression using IBM SPSS Statistics Standard.

Outcomes: Out of the 70 eyes with primary open angle glaucoma examined that had visual acuity 0,7 or better, 35 were included in stage 1 (MD 0.01dB -> -6dB), 21 in stage 2 (MD -6.01dB -> -12dB) and 14 in stage 3 (MD -12.01dB -> -20dB). A considerable statistic correlation was found between CH and VFI both in the entire group of primary open angle glaucoma patients( r=0.44, p<0.001), and in stages 1 (r=0.44, p<0.009), 2 (r=0.51, p<0.01) and 3 (r=0.52, p<0.05).

Conclusion: The study shows a moderate correlation, statistically significant, between corneal hysteresis and visual field index in glaucoma patients. Ocular response analyzer can be considered an useful instrument in evaluation of primary open angle glaucoma patients.

Citing Articles

Corneal biomechanics and diagnostics: a review.

Komninou M, Seiler T, Enzmann V Int Ophthalmol. 2024; 44(1):132.

PMID: 38478103 PMC: 10937779. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-024-03057-1.


Corneal Biomechanics - an Emerging Ocular Property with a Significant Impact.

Marinescu M, Dascalescu D, Constantin M, Coviltir V, Burcel M, Darabus D Maedica (Bucur). 2023; 17(4):925-930.

PMID: 36818253 PMC: 9923086. DOI: 10.26574/maedica.2022.17.4.925.


Association Between Ocular Biomechanics Measured With Corvis ST and Glaucoma Severity in Patients With Untreated Primary Open Angle Glaucoma.

Wu N, Chen Y, Sun X Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022; 11(6):10.

PMID: 35679036 PMC: 9187943. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.11.6.10.


Corneal Hysteresis in Thais and Variation of Corneal Hysteresis in Glaucoma.

Rojananuangnit K Clin Optom (Auckl). 2021; 13:287-299.

PMID: 34629920 PMC: 8493478. DOI: 10.2147/OPTO.S324187.


2-D Ultrasonic Array-Based Optical Coherence Elastography.

Kang H, Qian X, Chen R, Wodnicki R, Sun Y, Li R IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2020; 68(4):1096-1104.

PMID: 33095699 PMC: 8106462. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2020.3033304.


References
1.
Doughty M, Zaman M . Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000; 44(5):367-408. DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6257(00)00110-7. View

2.
Wolfs R, Klaver C, Vingerling J, Grobbee D, Hofman A, de Jong P . Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: The Rotterdam Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997; 123(6):767-72. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)71125-0. View

3.
Whitacre M, Stein R, Hassanein K . The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993; 115(5):592-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)71455-2. View

4.
Deol M, Taylor D, Radcliffe N . Corneal hysteresis and its relevance to glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015; 26(2):96-102. PMC: 4323574. DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000130. View

5.
Garcia-Porta N, Fernandes P, Queiros A, Salgado-Borges J, Parafita-Mato M, Gonzalez-Meijome J . Corneal biomechanical properties in different ocular conditions and new measurement techniques. ISRN Ophthalmol. 2014; 2014:724546. PMC: 3960740. DOI: 10.1155/2014/724546. View