» Articles » PMID: 8488910

The Effect of Corneal Thickness on Applanation Tonometry

Overview
Journal Am J Ophthalmol
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 1993 May 15
PMID 8488910
Citations 118
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Simultaneous manometry and Perkins tonometry were performed at 10.0, 20.0, and 30.0 mm Hg on 15 eyes on which intraocular procedures were performed. There was a statistically significant relationship between corneal thickness and the error of Perkins tonometry. Thin corneas produced underestimations of the intraocular pressure by as much as 4.9 mm Hg, whereas thick corneas produced overestimations by as much as 6.8 mm Hg. Measuring the corneal thickness is necessary to interpret properly the results of Goldmann applanation tonometry, particularly in eyes with thin corneas.

Citing Articles

Intraocular pressure and its determinants in a very old population. The ural very old study.

Bikbov M, Kazakbaeva G, Rakhimova E, Panda-Jonas S, Tuliakova A, Fakhretdinova A Heliyon. 2024; 10(4):e25794.

PMID: 38375271 PMC: 10875446. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25794.


Characterization of intraocular pressure variability in conscious rats.

Nicou C, Passaglia C Exp Eye Res. 2023; 239:109757.

PMID: 38123009 PMC: 10922224. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2023.109757.


The influence of altitude on the differences between Goldmann tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry: An ecological meta-analysis.

Albis-Donado O, Ramirez-Neria P, Rios-Acosta N, Stalmans I Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023; 72(Suppl 3):S398-S403.

PMID: 38099358 PMC: 467013. DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_907_23.


Prevalence of Glaucoma and Its Systemic Risk Factors in a General Japanese Population: The Hisayama Study.

Fujiwara K, Yasuda M, Hata J, Nakano S, Hashimoto S, Ueda E Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022; 11(11):11.

PMID: 36378141 PMC: 9672895. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.11.11.11.


The Shape of Corneal Deformation Alters Air Puff-Induced Loading.

Yousefi A, Roberts C, Reilly M Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10:848060.

PMID: 35433651 PMC: 9006101. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.848060.