» Articles » PMID: 28461949

What Do We Get from Navigation in Primary THA?

Overview
Journal EFORT Open Rev
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2017 May 3
PMID 28461949
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Navigation in primary total hip arthroplasty has a history of over 20 years. During this process, imageless computer navigation can be particularly helpful in optimally restoring the hip's biomechanics. This involves the accurate placement of the acetabular component with the determination of the anteversion and abduction, whereby the navigated femur-first technique also allows for a calculation of the combined anteversion. Additional critical parameters such as the reconstruction of the rotation centre, as well as the femoral and acetabular offset, can also be optimally adjusted. Last but not least, an intra-operative evaluation and equalisation of the leg length is possible.Nonetheless, the disadvantages of this surgical technique in terms of the high costs in the acquisition and preservation of the necessary devices, as well as the longer operation time, must be taken into account. However, economic aspects are not the only thing preventing widespread use of the navigation technique. Determining the plane of reference (APP) for the optimal orientation of the implants is based on palpation of the bony landmarks - and this is influenced by the thickness of the soft tissue layer. Furthermore, the experience of the surgeon constitutes a variable that influences the accuracy of navigation.In summary, hip navigation certainly offers an interesting technique for the optimisation of total hip arthroplasty with reconstruction of proper biomechanics. At the same time, there is currently a lack of high-quality randomised controlled long-term trials that evaluate the clinical advantage for the patients, together with cost utility and survival rates. Cite this article: Renner L, Janz V, Perka C, Wassilew GI. What do we get from navigation in primary THA? 2016;1:205-210. 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000034.

Citing Articles

Imageless navigation system (Naviswiss) provides accurate component position in total hip arthroplasty with lateral decubitus position for end-stage hip osteoarthritis: a prospective cohort study with CT-validation.

Scholes C, Fatima M, Schwagli T, Liu D Arthroplasty. 2024; 6(1):3.

PMID: 38191491 PMC: 10773062. DOI: 10.1186/s42836-023-00224-0.


CT validation of intraoperative imageless navigation (Naviswiss) for component positioning accuracy in primary total hip arthroplasty in supine patient position: a prospective observational cohort study in a single-surgeon practice.

Scholes C, Schwagli T, Ireland J Arthroplasty. 2023; 5(1):63.

PMID: 38049889 PMC: 10696686. DOI: 10.1186/s42836-023-00217-z.


Superior outcomes of total hip arthroplasty without prior lumbar arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Giai Via R, Migliorini F, Bosco F, Onorato F, Secco D, Giustra F Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023; 34(2):699-711.

PMID: 37847406 PMC: 10857961. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-023-03761-1.


Orthopedic Surgeons' Accuracy When Orienting an Acetabular Cup. A Comparison with Untrained Individuals.

Moreta J, Gayoso O, Donaire-Hoyas D, Roces-Garcia J, Gomez-Vallejo J, Moya-Gomez E Medicina (Kaunas). 2022; 58(7).

PMID: 35888692 PMC: 9317603. DOI: 10.3390/medicina58070973.


Clinical and surgical outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional total hip arthroplasty: a systematic overview of meta-analyses.

Kort N, Stirling P, Pilot P, Muller J EFORT Open Rev. 2022; 6(12):1157-1165.

PMID: 35839094 PMC: 8693228. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200121.


References
1.
Wassilew G, Perka C, Janz V, Konig C, Asbach P, Hasart O . Use of an ultrasound-based navigation system for an accurate acetabular positioning in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Arthroplasty. 2011; 27(5):687-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.038. View

2.
Lewinnek G, Lewis J, Tarr R, COMPERE C, Zimmerman J . Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978; 60(2):217-20. View

3.
Dorr L, Wan Z, Malik A, Zhu J, Dastane M, Deshmane P . A comparison of surgeon estimation and computed tomographic measurement of femoral component anteversion in cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(11):2598-604. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01225. View

4.
Saxler G, Marx A, Vandevelde D, Langlotz U, Tannast M, Wiese M . The accuracy of free-hand cup positioning--a CT based measurement of cup placement in 105 total hip arthroplasties. Int Orthop. 2004; 28(4):198-201. PMC: 3456929. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-004-0542-5. View

5.
Sariali E, Mauprivez R, Khiami F, Pascal-Mousselard H, Catonne Y . Accuracy of the preoperative planning for cementless total hip arthroplasty. A randomised comparison between three-dimensional computerised planning and conventional templating. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012; 98(2):151-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.09.023. View