» Articles » PMID: 19412648

Acetabular Polyethylene Wear and Acetabular Inclination and Femoral Offset

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2009 May 5
PMID 19412648
Citations 109
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: Restoration of femoral offset and acetabular inclination may have an effect on polyethylene (PE) wear in THA. We therefore assessed the effect of femoral offset and acetabular inclination (angle) on acetabular conventional (not highly cross-linked) PE wear in uncemented THA. We prospectively followed 43 uncemented THAs for a minimum of 49 months (mean, 64 months; range, 49-88 months). Radiographs were assessed for femoral offset, acetabular inclination, and conventional PE wear. The mean (+/- standard deviation) linear wear rate in all THAs was 0.14 mm/year (+/- 0.01 mm/year) and the mean volumetric wear rate was 53.1 mm(3)/year (+/- 5.5 mm(3)/year). In THAs with an acetabular angle less than 45 degrees , the mean wear was 0.12 mm/year (+/- 0.01 mm/year) compared with 0.18 mm/year (+/- 0.02 mm/year) in those with a reconstructed acetabular angle greater than 45 degrees . Reproduction of a reconstructed femoral offset to within 5 mm of the native femoral offset was associated with a reduction in conventional PE wear (0.12 mm/year versus 0.16 mm/year). Careful placement of the acetabular component to ensure an acetabular angle less than 45 degrees in the reconstructed hip allows for reduced conventional PE wear.

Level Of Evidence: Level II, prospective study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Citing Articles

Comparing cup placement, leg length, and offset discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty between CT-based robotic arm-assisted and navigation systems.

Shimizu A, Murakami S, Tamai T, Haga Y, Kutsuna T, Kinoshita T Bone Jt Open. 2024; 6(1):3-11.

PMID: 39740687 PMC: 11688127. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0173.R1.


Accuracy of acetabular cup positioning in robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty: a CT-based evaluation.

Singh A, Kumar P, Kalyan K, Gundalli A, Mane S, Swarnkar H SICOT J. 2024; 10:57.

PMID: 39705556 PMC: 11661779. DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2024057.


Does the placement of acetabular cups differ between right and left sides for a right-handed surgeon operating through a direct lateral approach? A comparative study.

Khalifa A, Abdelaal A Arthroplasty. 2024; 6(1):58.

PMID: 39497213 PMC: 11536924. DOI: 10.1186/s42836-024-00278-8.


Impact of surgical approaches on stem position and hidden blood loss in total hip arthroplasty: minimally invasive vs. posterolateral.

Yuan G, Xiao Y, Li Z, Chen Z, Liu X BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):681.

PMID: 39210297 PMC: 11363634. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07806-2.


Techniques and Technologies for the Intraoperative Assessment of Component Positioning, Leg Lengths, and Offset in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Chung C, Bin Hazzaa I, Hakim R, Zywiel M Arthroplast Today. 2024; 27:101361.

PMID: 39071838 PMC: 11282408. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101361.


References
1.
Kligman M, Michael H, Roffman M . The effect of abduction differences between cup and contralateral acetabular angle on polyethylene component wear. Orthopedics. 2002; 25(1):65-7. DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-20020101-18. View

2.
Barrack R . Factors influencing polyethylene wear in total joint arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1998; 21(9):937-40. DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-19980901-05. View

3.
Del Schutte Jr H, Lipman A, Bannar S, Livermore J, Ilstrup D, Morrey B . Effects of acetabular abduction on cup wear rates in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1998; 13(6):621-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(98)80003-x. View

4.
Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, Gill H, Murray D . The creep and wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene: a three-year randomised, controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90(5):556-61. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B5.20545. View

5.
Bankston A, Faris P, Keating E, Ritter M . Polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty in patient-matched groups. A comparison of stainless steel, cobalt chrome, and titanium-bearing surfaces. J Arthroplasty. 1993; 8(3):315-22. DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(06)80095-1. View