» Articles » PMID: 28457262

Prevalence of Gingival Recession After Orthodontic Tooth Movements

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2017 May 2
PMID 28457262
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: This study was designed to evaluate the long-term prevalence of gingival recession after orthodontic tooth movements, focusing on the effects of mandibular incisor proclination and expansion of maxillary posterior teeth.

Methods: Records of 205 patients (162 female, 43 male) were obtained from 2 private practice orthodontists. Using pretreatment (age, 14.0 ± 5.9 years) and posttreatment (age, 16.5 ± 6.0 years) lateral cephalograms and dental models, mandibular incisor proclination and maxillary arch widths were measured. Gingival recession was measured based on posttreatment and postretention (age, 32.3 ± 8.5 years) intraoral photographs and models. Associations between tooth movements and gingival recession were evaluated statistically.

Results: Only 5.8% of teeth exhibited recession at the end of orthodontic treatment (only 0.6% had recession >1 mm). After retention, 41.7% of the teeth showed recession, but the severity was limited (only 7.0% >1 mm). There was no relationship between mandibular incisor proclination during treatment and posttreatment gingival recession. Incisors that finished treatment angulated (IMPA) at 95° or greater did not show significantly more recession than did those that finished less than 95°. There were weak positive correlations (r = 0.17-0.41) between maxillary arch width increases during treatment and posttreatment recession.

Conclusions: Orthodontic treatment is not a major risk factor for the development of gingival recession. Although greater amounts of maxillary expansion during treatment increase the risks of posttreatment recession, the effects are minimal.

Citing Articles

Does incisor inclination change during orthodontic treatment affect gingival thickness and the width of keratinized gingiva? A prospective controlled study.

Kloukos D, Koukos G, Doulis I, Stavropoulos A, Katsaros C Eur J Orthod. 2025; 47(2).

PMID: 39917991 PMC: 11803420. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjaf001.


Biomechanical effects of different mandibular movements and torque compensations during mandibular advancement with clear aligners: a finite element analysis.

Wang Y, Daraqel B, Wang Y, Yang D, Dong Y, Hu Y Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1496517.

PMID: 39610938 PMC: 11603354. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1496517.


Gene Therapeutic Drug pCMV-VEGF165 Plasmid ('Neovasculgen') Promotes Gingiva Soft Tissue Augmentation in Rabbits.

Koteneva P, Kosheleva N, Fayzullin A, Khristidis Y, Rasulov T, Kulova A Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(18).

PMID: 39337502 PMC: 11432250. DOI: 10.3390/ijms251810013.


Bone Remodeling of Maxilla after Retraction of Incisors during Orthodontic Treatment with Extraction of Premolars Based on CBCT Study: A Systematic Review.

Kuc A, Kotula J, Nawrocki J, Kulgawczyk M, Kawala B, Lis J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38592367 PMC: 10932275. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051503.


Difference in Buccal Gingival Thickness between the Mandible and Maxilla in the Aesthetic Zone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Schwarz L, Andrukhov O, Rausch M, Rausch-Fan X, Jonke E J Clin Med. 2024; 13(6).

PMID: 38542013 PMC: 10971348. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13061789.