» Articles » PMID: 36984585

Periodontal Phenotype Modification Using Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft and Bone Graft in the Mandibular Anterior Teeth with Mucogingival Problems Following Orthodontic Treatment

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Mar 29
PMID 36984585
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Among the complications of orthodontic treatment, mucogingival problems with gingival recession in the mandibular anterior teeth are challenging for clinicians. Mucogingival problems can lead to esthetic deficits, thermal hypersensitivity, tooth brushing pain, and complicated plaque control. Herein, we present a case of a 16-year-old female with gingival recession in the left mandibular central incisor after orthodontic treatment. The preoperative clinical findings showed a thin soft tissue biotype with root prominence in the mandibular anterior area. The interdental area was relatively depressed. After reflection of the full-thickness flap, root coverage using a bone graft substitute and subepithelial connective tissue graft obtained from the palatal mucosa was performed. The 6-month and 5-year postoperative clinical findings showed improved soft tissue phenotype. The cross-sectional CBCT scans 5 years after surgery showed a well-maintained labial bone plate in the mandibular incisors. Within the limitations of this case report, for patients with gingival recession in the mandibular incisors after orthodontic treatment, a successful biotype modification can be achieved with a combined procedure using subepithelial connective tissue graft with bone graft substitutes.

Citing Articles

Periodontal Phenotype Modification of Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Deficiency Using Subepithelial Connective Tissue Grafts and Bone Grafts in the Esthetic Region.

Park W, Yumar R, Han J, Kang P Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(6).

PMID: 38929458 PMC: 11205640. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60060841.

References
1.
Tozum T, Keceli H, Guncu G, Hatipoglu H, Sengun D . Treatment of gingival recession: comparison of two techniques of subepithelial connective tissue graft. J Periodontol. 2005; 76(11):1842-8. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.11.1842. View

2.
Schwarz F, Herten M, Ferrari D, Wieland M, Schmitz L, Engelhardt E . Guided bone regeneration at dehiscence-type defects using biphasic hydroxyapatite + beta tricalcium phosphate (Bone Ceramic) or a collagen-coated natural bone mineral (BioOss Collagen): an immunohistochemical study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 36(12):1198-206. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.07.014. View

3.
Chambrone L, Garcia-Valenzuela F . Periodontal phenotype modification of complexes periodontal-orthodontic case scenarios: A clinical review on the applications of allogenous dermal matrix as an alternative to subepithelial connective tissue graft. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022; 35(1):158-167. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12980. View

4.
Gorski B, Szerszen M, Kaczynski T . Effect of 24% EDTA root conditioning on the outcome of modified coronally advanced tunnel technique with subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2021; 26(2):1761-1772. PMC: 8816759. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04151-9. View

5.
Ribeiro F, Pontes A, Zuza E, da Silva V, Lia R, Marcantonio Junior E . Connective tissue graft as a biological barrier for guided tissue regeneration in intrabony defects: a histological study in dogs. Clin Oral Investig. 2014; 19(5):997-1004. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-014-1323-1. View