» Articles » PMID: 28426281

Identification of SSEA-1 Expressing Enhanced Reprogramming (SEER) Cells in Porcine Embryonic Fibroblasts

Overview
Journal Cell Cycle
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2017 Apr 21
PMID 28426281
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous research has shown that a subpopulation of cells within cultured human dermal fibroblasts, termed multilineage-differentiating stress enduring (Muse) cells, are preferentially reprogrammed into induced pluripotent stem cells. However, controversy exists over whether these cells are the only cells capable of being reprogrammed from a heterogeneous population of fibroblasts. Similarly, there is little research to suggest such cells may exist in embryonic tissues or other species. To address if such a cell population exists in pigs, we investigated porcine embryonic fibroblast populations (pEFs) and identified heterogeneous expression of several key cell surface markers. Strikingly, we discovered a small population of stage-specific embryonic antigen 1 positive cells (SSEA-1+) in Danish Landrace and Göttingen minipig pEFs, which were absent in the Yucatan pEFs. Furthermore, reprogramming of SSEA-1+ sorted pEFs led to higher reprogramming efficiency. Subsequent transcriptome profiling of the SSEA-1+ vs. the SSEA-1neg cell fraction revealed highly comparable gene signatures. However several genes that were found to be upregulated in the SSEA-1+ cells were similarly expressed in mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). We therefore termed these cells SSEA-1 Expressing Enhanced Reprogramming (SEER) cells. Interestingly, SEER cells were more effective at differentiating into osteocytes and chondrocytes in vitro. We conclude that SEER cells are more amenable for reprogramming and that the expression of mesenchymal stem cell genes is advantageous in the reprogramming process. This data provides evidence supporting the elite theory and helps to delineate which cell types and specific genes are important for reprogramming in the pig.

Citing Articles

Oocytes, embryos and pluripotent stem cells from a biomedical perspective.

Hyttel P, Pessoa L, Secher J, Dittlau K, Freude K, Hall V Anim Reprod. 2020; 16(3):508-523.

PMID: 32435294 PMC: 7234146. DOI: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR2019-0054.


Study of the protective effect on damaged intestinal epithelial cells of rat multilineage-differentiating stress-enduring (Muse) cells.

Sun D, Yang L, Cao H, Shen Z, Song H Cell Biol Int. 2019; 44(2):549-559.

PMID: 31642560 PMC: 7003933. DOI: 10.1002/cbin.11255.

References
1.
Nielsen T, Jakobsson J, Rosenqvist N, Lundberg C . Incorporating double copies of a chromatin insulator into lentiviral vectors results in less viral integrants. BMC Biotechnol. 2009; 9:13. PMC: 2651870. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6750-9-13. View

2.
Montzka K, Lassonczyk N, Tschoke B, Neuss S, Fuhrmann T, Franzen R . Neural differentiation potential of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells: misleading marker gene expression. BMC Neurosci. 2009; 10:16. PMC: 2655300. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-10-16. View

3.
Hansson J, Rafiee M, Reiland S, Polo J, Gehring J, Okawa S . Highly coordinated proteome dynamics during reprogramming of somatic cells to pluripotency. Cell Rep. 2012; 2(6):1579-92. PMC: 4438680. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.10.014. View

4.
Buganim Y, Faddah D, Jaenisch R . Mechanisms and models of somatic cell reprogramming. Nat Rev Genet. 2013; 14(6):427-39. PMC: 4060150. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3473. View

5.
Juhl M, Tratwal J, Follin B, Sondergaard R, Kirchhoff M, Ekblond A . Comparison of clinical grade human platelet lysates for cultivation of mesenchymal stromal cells from bone marrow and adipose tissue. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2016; 76(2):93-104. DOI: 10.3109/00365513.2015.1099723. View