» Articles » PMID: 23494352

Flexible Search Tactics and Efficient Foraging in Saltatory Searching Animals

Overview
Journal Oecologia
Date 2013 Mar 16
PMID 23494352
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Foraging is one of the most important endeavors undertaken by animals, and it has been studied intensively from both mechanistic-empirical and optimal foraging perspectives. Planktivorous fish make excellent study organisms for foraging studies because they feed frequently and in a relatively simple environment. Most optimal foraging studies of planktivorous fish have focused, either on diet choice or habitat selection and have assumed that these animals used a cruise search foraging strategy. We have recently recognized that white crappie do not use a cruise search strategy (swimming continuously and searching constantly) while foraging on zooplankton but move in a stop and go pattern, searching only while paused. We have termed thissaltatory search. Many other animals move in a stop and go pattern while foraging, but none have been shown to search only while paused. Not only do white crappie search in a saltatory manner but the components of the search cycle change when feeding on prey of different size. When feeding on large prey these fish move further and faster after an unsuccessful search than when feeding on small prey. The fish also pause for a shorter period to search when feeding on large prey. To evaluate the efficiency of these alterations in the search cycle, a net energy gain simulation model was developed. The model computes the likelihood of locating 1 or 2 different size classes of zooplankton prey as a function of the volume of water scanned. The volume of new water searched is dependent upon the dimensions of the search volume and the length of the run. Energy costs for each component of the search cycle, and energy gained from the different sized prey, were assessed. The model predicts that short runs produce maximum net energy gains when crappie feed on small prey but predicts net energy gains will be maximized with longer runs when crappie feed on large prey or a mixed assemblage of large and small prey. There is an optimal run length due to high energy costs of unsuccessful search when runs are short and reveal little new water, and high energy costs of long runs when runs are lengthy. The model predicts that if the greater search times observed when crappie feed on small prey are assessed when they feed on a mixed diet of small and large prey, net energy gained is less than if small prey are deleted from the diet. We believe the model has considerable generality. Many animals are observed to move in a saltatory manner while foraging and some are thought to search only while stationary. Some birds and lizards are, known to modify the search cycle in a manner similar to white crappie.

Citing Articles

Do Giant Pandas Prefer Steeper Habitats? A Case Study on Panda Spatial Utilization in the Qinling Mountains, China.

Yang C, Wen W, Wang Y, Yang Z, Li C, Yang S Ecol Evol. 2025; 15(3):e71074.

PMID: 40046844 PMC: 11882222. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.71074.


Increasing temperature and prey availability affect the growth and swimming kinematics of Atlantic herring () larvae.

Allan B, Browman H, Shema S, Skiftesvik A, Folkvord A, Durif C J Plankton Res. 2022; 44(3):401-413.

PMID: 35664086 PMC: 9155230. DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fbac014.


Exploration speed in captivity predicts foraging tactics and diet in free-living red knots.

Ersoy S, Beardsworth C, Dekinga A, van der Meer M, Piersma T, Groothuis T J Anim Ecol. 2021; 91(2):356-366.

PMID: 34753198 PMC: 9299047. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13632.


Intermittent inverse-square Lévy walks are optimal for finding targets of all sizes.

Guinard B, Korman A Sci Adv. 2021; 7(15).

PMID: 33837080 PMC: 8034848. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abe8211.


Fish with red fluorescent eyes forage more efficiently under dim, blue-green light conditions.

Harant U, Michiels N BMC Ecol. 2017; 17(1):18.

PMID: 28427391 PMC: 5397785. DOI: 10.1186/s12898-017-0127-y.


References
1.
KLEEREKOPER H, Timms A, Westlake G, Davy F, Malar T, Anderson V . An analysis of locomotor behaviour of goldfish (Carassius auratus). Anim Behav. 1970; 18(2):317-30. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-3472(70)80044-6. View

2.
Anderson R, Karasov W . Contrasts in energy intake and expenditure in sit-and-wait and widely foraging lizards. Oecologia. 2017; 49(1):67-72. DOI: 10.1007/BF00376899. View

3.
Mittelbach G . Optimal foraging and growth in bluegills. Oecologia. 2017; 59(2-3):157-162. DOI: 10.1007/BF00378832. View

4.
Pyke G . Optimal foraging: movement patterns of bumblebees between inflorescences. Theor Popul Biol. 1978; 13(1):72-98. DOI: 10.1016/0040-5809(78)90036-9. View

5.
Cody M . Finch flocks in the Mohave desert. Theor Popul Biol. 1971; 2(2):142-58. DOI: 10.1016/0040-5809(71)90012-8. View