» Articles » PMID: 28283485

QUIT EMR Trial: a Prospective, Observational, Multicentre Study to Evaluate Quality and 24 hours Post-transport Morbidity of Interhospital Transportation of Critically Ill Patients: Study Protocol

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 Mar 12
PMID 28283485
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: It is widely accepted that transportation of critically ill patients is high risk. Unfortunately, however, there are currently no evidence-based criteria with which to determine the quality of various interhospital transport systems and their impact on the outcomes for patients. We aim to rectify this by assessing 2 scores which were developed in our hospital in a prospective, observational study. Primarily, we will be examining the Quality of interhospital critical care transportation in the Euregion Meuse-Rhine (QUIT EMR) score, which focuses on the quality of the transport system, and secondarily the SEMROS (Simplified EMR outcome score) which detects changes in the patient's clinical condition in the 24 hours following their transportation.

Methods And Analysis: A web-based application will be used to document around 150 pretransport, intratransport and post-transport items of each patient case.To be included, patients must be at least 18-years of age and should have been supervised by a physician during an interhospital transport which was started in the study region.The quality of the QUIT EMR score will be assessed by comparing 3 predefined levels of transport facilities: the high, medium and low standards. Subsequently, SEMROS will be used to determine the effect of transport quality on the morbidity 24 hours after transportation.It is estimated that there will be roughly 3000 appropriate cases suitable for inclusion in this study per year. Cases shall be collected from 1 April 2015 until 31 December 2017.

Ethics And Dissemination: This trial was approved by the Ethics committees of the university hospitals of Maastricht (Netherlands) and Aachen (Germany). The study results will be published in a peer reviewed journal. Results of this study will determine if a prospective randomised trial involving patients of various categories being randomly assigned to different levels of transportation system shall be conducted.

Trial Registration Number: NTR4937.

Citing Articles

Boosting the accuracy of existing models by updating and extending: using a multicenter COVID-19 ICU cohort as a proxy.

Meijs D, Wynants L, van Kuijk S, Scheeren C, Hana A, Mehagnoul-Schipper J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):26344.

PMID: 39487145 PMC: 11530535. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-70333-6.


The QUality of Interhospital Transportation in the Euregion Meuse-Rhine (QUIT-EMR) score: a cross-validation study.

Strauch U, Florack M, Jansen J, van Bussel B, Beckers S, Habers J BMJ Open. 2021; 11(11):e051100.

PMID: 34799362 PMC: 8606780. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051100.


Differences and Similarities Among COVID-19 Patients Treated in Seven ICUs in Three Countries Within One Region: An Observational Cohort Study.

Mesotten D, Meijs D, van Bussel B, Stessel B, Mehagnoul-Schipper J, Hana A Crit Care Med. 2021; 50(4):595-606.

PMID: 34636804 PMC: 8923276. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005314.


[Appropriate allocation of resources for interhospital transfer in emergency medical service-is a physician in the dispatch center helpful?].

Schroder H, Brockert A, Beckers S, Follmann A, Sommer A, Kork F Anaesthesist. 2020; 69(10):726-732.

PMID: 32671429 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-020-00817-3.

References
1.
Vos G, Nissen A, Nieman F, Meurs M, van Waardenburg D, Ramsay G . Comparison of interhospital pediatric intensive care transport accompanied by a referring specialist or a specialist retrieval team. Intensive Care Med. 2003; 30(2):302-308. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-003-2066-7. View

2.
Barratt H, Harrison D, Rowan K, Raine R . Effect of non-clinical inter-hospital critical care unit to unit transfer of critically ill patients: a propensity-matched cohort analysis. Crit Care. 2012; 16(5):R179. PMC: 3682280. DOI: 10.1186/cc11662. View

3.
Singh J, MacDonald R . Pro/con debate: do the benefits of regionalized critical care delivery outweigh the risks of interfacility patient transport?. Crit Care. 2009; 13(4):219. PMC: 2750128. DOI: 10.1186/cc7883. View

4.
Ligtenberg J, Arnold L, Stienstra Y, van der Werf T, Meertens J, Tulleken J . Quality of interhospital transport of critically ill patients: a prospective audit. Crit Care. 2005; 9(4):R446-51. PMC: 1269465. DOI: 10.1186/cc3749. View

5.
Ramnarayan P, Thiru K, Parslow R, Harrison D, Draper E, Rowan K . Effect of specialist retrieval teams on outcomes in children admitted to paediatric intensive care units in England and Wales: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2010; 376(9742):698-704. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61113-0. View