» Articles » PMID: 14991102

Incidents Relating to the Intra-hospital Transfer of Critically Ill Patients. An Analysis of the Reports Submitted to the Australian Incident Monitoring Study in Intensive Care

Overview
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2004 Mar 3
PMID 14991102
Citations 123
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Transportation of critically ill patients within the hospital poses important risks. We sought to identify causes, outcomes and contributing factors associated with intra-hospital transport.

Design: Cross-sectional case review.

Setting: Incident reports submitted to the Australian Incident Monitoring Study in Intensive Care (AIMS-ICU).

Measurement And Main Results: Between 1993 and 1999, 176 reports were submitted describing 191 incidents. Seventy-five reports (39%) identified equipment problems, relating prominently to battery/power supply, transport ventilator and monitor function, access to patient elevators and intubation equipment. Hundred sixteen reports (61%) identified patient/staff management issues including poor communication, inadequate monitoring, incorrect set-up of equipment, artificial airway malpositioning and incorrect positioning of patients. Serious adverse outcomes occurred in 55 reports (31%) including major physiological derangement (15%), patient/relative dissatisfaction (7%), prolonged hospital stay (4%), physical/psychological injury (3%) and death (2%). Of 900 contributing factors identified, 46% were system-based and 54% human-based. Communication problems, inadequate protocols, in-servicing/training and equipment were prominent equipment-related incidents. Errors of problem recognition and judgement, failure to follow protocols, inadequate patient preparation, haste and inattention were common management-related incidents. Rechecking the patient and equipment, skilled assistance and prior experience were important factors limiting harm.

Conclusions: Intra-hospital transport poses an important risk to ICU patients. The adequate provision of highly qualified staff, specially designed and well maintained equipment, as well as continuous monitoring are essential to avoid/mitigate these incidents. Professional societies and local units should adopt guidelines/protocols for intra-hospital transportation. Monitoring of incidents should aid in the continuous improvement in patient safety.

Citing Articles

Lung Ultrasound Score as a Predictor of Clinical Severity and Prognosis in Patients of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia.

Panda S, Agarwal A, Mishra S, Jain G, Talawar P Indian J Crit Care Med. 2025; 28(11):1009-1014.

PMID: 39882053 PMC: 11773579. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24828.


Implementing an intrahospital transport preparation (IHT) and management project for critically ill patients: identification of barriers and facilitators using consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) - a qualitative study.

Wang J, Zhang X, Li G, Lu Y, Xie R, Cui M BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e096290.

PMID: 39832958 PMC: 11751779. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096290.


Advantage of bedside versus conventional operating room surgery in the management of term and preterm newborn infants: a single center retrospective observational study.

Costa S, Fattore S, Brughitta C, Catalano P, Frattaruolo N, Sollazzi L Pediatr Surg Int. 2025; 41(1):57.

PMID: 39751923 PMC: 11698754. DOI: 10.1007/s00383-024-05937-0.


Simulation-Based Enhancement of Patient Safety During Intrahospital Transport of Trauma Patients With COVID-19: A Helipad Scenario.

Arslan B, Sutasir M, Kapci M, Korkut S, Altinarik S Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e67484.

PMID: 39310477 PMC: 11416032. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.67484.


Ventilator-associated pneumonia: pathobiological heterogeneity and diagnostic challenges.

Howroyd F, Chacko C, MacDuff A, Gautam N, Pouchet B, Tunnicliffe B Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):6447.

PMID: 39085269 PMC: 11291905. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50805-z.


References
1.
Szem J, Hydo L, FISCHER E, Kapur S, Klemperer J, Barie P . High-risk intrahospital transport of critically ill patients: safety and outcome of the necessary "road trip". Crit Care Med. 1995; 23(10):1660-6. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199510000-00009. View

2.
Caruana M, Culp K . Intrahospital transport of the critically ill adult: a research review and implications. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 1998; 17(3):146-56. DOI: 10.1097/00003465-199805000-00005. View

3.
Bion J, Edlin S, Ramsay G, McCabe S, LEDINGHAM I . Validation of a prognostic score in critically ill patients undergoing transport. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985; 291(6493):432-4. PMC: 1416287. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.291.6493.432. View

4.
Hurst J, Davis Jr K, Johnson D, Branson R, Campbell R, Branson P . Cost and complications during in-hospital transport of critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study. J Trauma. 1992; 33(4):582-5. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199210000-00015. View

5.
Ridley S, Carter R . The effects of secondary transport on critically ill patients. Anaesthesia. 1989; 44(10):822-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1989.tb09099.x. View