» Articles » PMID: 28278002

Quantifying Abdominal Adipose Tissue and Thigh Muscle Volume and Hepatic Proton Density Fat Fraction: Repeatability and Accuracy of an MR Imaging-based, Semiautomated Analysis Method

Overview
Journal Radiology
Specialty Radiology
Date 2017 Mar 10
PMID 28278002
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose To determine the repeatability and accuracy of a commercially available magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-based, semiautomated method to quantify abdominal adipose tissue and thigh muscle volume and hepatic proton density fat fraction (PDFF). Materials and Methods This prospective study was institutional review board- approved and HIPAA compliant. All subjects provided written informed consent. Inclusion criteria were age of 18 years or older and willingness to participate. The exclusion criterion was contraindication to MR imaging. Three-dimensional T1-weighted dual-echo body-coil images were acquired three times. Source images were reconstructed to generate water and calibrated fat images. Abdominal adipose tissue and thigh muscle were segmented, and their volumes were estimated by using a semiautomated method and, as a reference standard, a manual method. Hepatic PDFF was estimated by using a confounder-corrected chemical shift-encoded MR imaging method with hybrid complex-magnitude reconstruction and, as a reference standard, MR spectroscopy. Tissue volume and hepatic PDFF intra- and interexamination repeatability were assessed by using intraclass correlation and coefficient of variation analysis. Tissue volume and hepatic PDFF accuracy were assessed by means of linear regression with the respective reference standards. Results Adipose and thigh muscle tissue volumes of 20 subjects (18 women; age range, 25-76 years; body mass index range, 19.3-43.9 kg/m) were estimated by using the semiautomated method. Intra- and interexamination intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.996-0.998 and coefficients of variation were 1.5%-3.6%. For hepatic MR imaging PDFF, intra- and interexamination intraclass correlation coefficients were greater than or equal to 0.994 and coefficients of variation were less than or equal to 7.3%. In the regression analyses of manual versus semiautomated volume and spectroscopy versus MR imaging, PDFF slopes and intercepts were close to the identity line, and correlations of determination at multivariate analysis (R) ranged from 0.744 to 0.994. Conclusion This MR imaging-based, semiautomated method provides high repeatability and accuracy for estimating abdominal adipose tissue and thigh muscle volumes and hepatic PDFF. RSNA, 2017.

Citing Articles

Quantitative Assessment of Body Composition in Cirrhosis.

Eriksen C, Moller S Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(19).

PMID: 39410594 PMC: 11482591. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14192191.


Behind BMI: The Potential Indicative Role of Abdominal Ectopic Fat on Glucose Metabolism.

Li X, Ren H, Xu H, Han X, Lu J, Yang Z Obes Facts. 2024; 17(2):158-168.

PMID: 38246158 PMC: 10987183. DOI: 10.1159/000536160.


A rapid, non-invasive, clinical surveillance for CachExia, sarcopenia, portal hypertension, and hepatocellular carcinoma in end-stage liver disease: the ACCESS-ESLD study protocol.

Nasr P, Forsgren M, Balkhed W, Jonsson C, Dahlstrom N, Simonsson C BMC Gastroenterol. 2023; 23(1):454.

PMID: 38129794 PMC: 10734181. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-03093-8.


Repeatability of MRI Biomarkers in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: The NIMBLE Consortium.

Fowler K, Venkatesh S, Obuchowski N, Middleton M, Chen J, Pepin K Radiology. 2023; 309(1):e231092.

PMID: 37815451 PMC: 10625902. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.231092.


Update on muscle imaging in myositis.

Tan A, Di Matteo A, Wakefield R, Biglands J Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2023; 35(6):395-403.

PMID: 37656661 PMC: 10552815. DOI: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000975.


References
1.
Bydder M, Hamilton G, Yokoo T, Sirlin C . Optimal phased-array combination for spectroscopy. Magn Reson Imaging. 2008; 26(6):847-50. PMC: 2868913. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2008.01.050. View

2.
Broderick B, Dessus S, Grace P, OLaighin G . Technique for the computation of lower leg muscle bulk from magnetic resonance images. Med Eng Phys. 2010; 32(8):926-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.06.008. View

3.
Romu T, Dahlstrom N, Dahlqvist Leinhard O, Borga M . Robust water fat separated dual-echo MRI by phase-sensitive reconstruction. Magn Reson Med. 2016; 78(3):1208-1216. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26488. View

4.
Brunner G, Nambi V, Yang E, Kumar A, Virani S, Kougias P . Automatic quantification of muscle volumes in magnetic resonance imaging scans of the lower extremities. Magn Reson Imaging. 2011; 29(8):1065-75. PMC: 11670142. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2011.02.033. View

5.
Bonekamp S, Ghosh P, Crawford S, Solga S, Horska A, Brancati F . Quantitative comparison and evaluation of software packages for assessment of abdominal adipose tissue distribution by magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Obes (Lond). 2007; 32(1):100-11. PMC: 3096530. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803696. View