Quantitative Comparison and Evaluation of Software Packages for Assessment of Abdominal Adipose Tissue Distribution by Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Overview

Journal Int J Obes (Lond)

Specialty Endocrinology

Date 2007 Aug 19

PMID 17700582

Citations 35

Authors

S Bonekamp

P Ghosh

S Crawford

S F Solga

A Horska

F L Brancati

A M Diehl

S Smith

J M Clark

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To examine five available software packages for the assessment of abdominal adipose tissue with magnetic resonance imaging, compare their features and assess the reliability of measurement results.

Design: Feature evaluation and test-retest reliability of softwares (NIHImage, SliceOmatic, Analyze, HippoFat and EasyVision) used in manual, semi-automated or automated segmentation of abdominal adipose tissue.

Subjects: A random sample of 15 obese adults with type 2 diabetes.

Measurements: Axial T1-weighted spin echo images centered at vertebral bodies of L2-L3 were acquired at 1.5 T. Five software packages were evaluated (NIHImage, SliceOmatic, Analyze, HippoFat and EasyVision), comparing manual, semi-automated and automated segmentation approaches. Images were segmented into cross-sectional area (CSA), and the areas of visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Ease of learning and use and the design of the graphical user interface (GUI) were rated. Intra-observer accuracy and agreement between the software packages were calculated using intra-class correlation. Intra-class correlation coefficient was used to obtain test-retest reliability.

Results: Three of the five evaluated programs offered a semi-automated technique to segment the images based on histogram values or a user-defined threshold. One software package allowed manual delineation only. One fully automated program demonstrated the drawbacks of uncritical automated processing. The semi-automated approaches reduced variability and measurement error, and improved reproducibility. There was no significant difference in the intra-observer agreement in SAT and CSA. The VAT measurements showed significantly lower test-retest reliability. There were some differences between the software packages in qualitative aspects, such as user friendliness.

Conclusion: Four out of five packages provided essentially the same results with respect to the inter- and intra-rater reproducibility. Our results using SliceOmatic, Analyze or NIHImage were comparable and could be used interchangeably. Newly developed fully automated approaches should be compared to one of the examined software packages.

Citing Articles

Abdominal adipose tissue and type 2 diabetic kidney disease: adipose radiology assessment, impact, and mechanisms.

Lu F, Fan J, Li F, Liu L, Chen Z, Tian Z Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023; 49(2):560-574.

PMID: 37847262 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-04062-1.

Abdominal fat quantification using convolutional networks.

Schneider D, Eggebrecht T, Linder A, Linder N, Schaudinn A, Bluher M Eur Radiol. 2023; 33(12):8957-8964.

PMID: 37436508 PMC: 10667157. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09865-w.

Comparison of CT and Dixon MR Abdominal Adipose Tissue Quantification Using a Unified Computer-Assisted Software Framework.

Hsu L, Ali Z, Bagheri H, Huda F, Redd B, Jones E Tomography. 2023; 9(3):1041-1051.

PMID: 37218945 PMC: 10204377. DOI: 10.3390/tomography9030085.

The relationships between physical activity, lumbar multifidus muscle morphology, and low back pain from childhood to early adulthood: a 12-year longitudinal study.

Cunningham E, Wedderkopp N, Kjaer P, Beynon A, Noble J, Hebert J Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):8851.

PMID: 35614086 PMC: 9132932. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12674-8.

Both intermuscular fat and LVEF decline promote heart failure symptoms in cancer survivors.

Reding K, OConnell N, DAgostino Jr R, Hundley W, Lucas A, Ladd A Cardiooncology. 2021; 7(1):16.

PMID: 33964981 PMC: 8105949. DOI: 10.1186/s40959-021-00102-1.

References

Ryan D, Espeland M, Foster G, Haffner S, Hubbard V, Johnson K . Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes): design and methods for a clinical trial of weight loss for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes. Control Clin Trials. 2003; 24(5):610-28. DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(03)00064-3. View

Kuk J, Lee S, Heymsfield S, Ross R . Waist circumference and abdominal adipose tissue distribution: influence of age and sex. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005; 81(6):1330-4. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/81.6.1330. View

Banerji M, Faridi N, Atluri R, Chaiken R, Lebovitz H . Body composition, visceral fat, leptin, and insulin resistance in Asian Indian men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999; 84(1):137-44. DOI: 10.1210/jcem.84.1.5371. View

Elbers J, Haumann G, Asscheman H, Seidell J, Gooren L . Reproducibility of fat area measurements in young, non-obese subjects by computerized analysis of magnetic resonance images. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1998; 21(12):1121-9. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800525. View

Foster M, Hutchison J, MALLARD J, Fuller M . Nuclear magnetic resonance pulse sequence and discrimination of high- and low-fat tissues. Magn Reson Imaging. 1984; 2(3):187-92. DOI: 10.1016/0730-725x(84)90004-3. View

Sironi A, Gastaldelli A, Mari A, Ciociaro D, Positano V, Postano V . Visceral fat in hypertension: influence on insulin resistance and beta-cell function. Hypertension. 2004; 44(2):127-33. DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000137982.10191.0a. View

Miyazaki Y, Glass L, Triplitt C, Wajcberg E, Mandarino L, DeFronzo R . Abdominal fat distribution and peripheral and hepatic insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2002; 283(6):E1135-43. DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.0327.2001. View

Gastaldelli A, Sironi A, Ciociaro D, Positano V, Buzzigoli E, Giannessi D . Visceral fat and beta cell function in non-diabetic humans. Diabetologia. 2005; 48(10):2090-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-005-1891-3. View

Janssen I, Ross R . Effects of sex on the change in visceral, subcutaneous adipose tissue and skeletal muscle in response to weight loss. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999; 23(10):1035-46. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801038. View

10.

Machann J, Thamer C, Schnoedt B, Stefan N, Stumvoll M, Haring H . Age and gender related effects on adipose tissue compartments of subjects with increased risk for type 2 diabetes: a whole body MRI/MRS study. MAGMA. 2005; 18(3):128-37. DOI: 10.1007/s10334-005-0104-x. View

11.

Ishikawa M, Koga K . Measurement of abdominal fat by magnetic resonance imaging of OLETF rats, an animal model of NIDDM. Magn Reson Imaging. 1998; 16(1):45-53. DOI: 10.1016/s0730-725x(97)00221-x. View

12.

Lee S, Janssen I, Ross R . Interindividual variation in abdominal subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: influence of measurement site. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004; 97(3):948-54. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01200.2003. View

13.

Positano V, Gastaldelli A, Sironi A, Santarelli M, Lombardi M, Landini L . An accurate and robust method for unsupervised assessment of abdominal fat by MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004; 20(4):684-9. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20167. View

14.

Garrow J, Stalley S, DIETHELM R, Pittet P, Hesp R, Halliday D . A new method for measuring the body density of obese adults. Br J Nutr. 1979; 42(2):173-83. DOI: 10.1079/bjn19790105. View

15.

Ross R . Magnetic resonance imaging provides new insights into the characterization of adipose and lean tissue distribution. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1996; 74(6):778-85. View

16.

Sobol W, Rossner S, Hinson B, Hiltbrandt E, Karstaedt N, Santago P . Evaluation of a new magnetic resonance imaging method for quantitating adipose tissue areas. Int J Obes. 1991; 15(9):589-99. View

17.

Ryu J, Craven T, MacArthur R, HINSON W, Bond M, Hagaman A . Relationship of intraabdominal fat as measured by magnetic resonance imaging to postprandial lipemia in middle-aged subjects. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994; 60(4):586-91. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/60.4.586. View

18.

Ross R, Janssen I, Dawson J, Kungl A, Kuk J, Wong S . Exercise-induced reduction in obesity and insulin resistance in women: a randomized controlled trial. Obes Res. 2004; 12(5):789-98. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2004.95. View

19.

Kanaley J, Sames C, Swisher L, Swick A, Ploutz-Snyder L, Steppan C . Abdominal fat distribution in pre- and postmenopausal women: The impact of physical activity, age, and menopausal status. Metabolism. 2001; 50(8):976-82. DOI: 10.1053/meta.2001.24931. View

20.

Bonora E, Micciolo R, Ghiatas A, Lancaster J, Alyassin A, Muggeo M . Is it possible to derive a reliable estimate of human visceral and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue from simple anthropometric measurements?. Metabolism. 1995; 44(12):1617-25. DOI: 10.1016/0026-0495(95)90084-5. View