» Articles » PMID: 28239234

Harnessing Demographic Differences in Organizations: What Moderates the Effects of Workplace Diversity?

Overview
Journal J Organ Behav
Date 2017 Feb 28
PMID 28239234
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To account for the double-edged nature of demographic workplace diversity (i.e,. relational demography, work group diversity, and organizational diversity) effects on social integration, performance, and well-being-related variables, research has moved away from simple main effect approaches and started examining variables that moderate these effects. While there is no shortage of primary studies of the conditions under which diversity leads to positive or negative outcomes, it remains unclear which contingency factors make it work. Using the Categorization-Elaboration Model as our theoretical lens, we review variables moderating the effects of workplace diversity on social integration, performance, and well-being outcomes, focusing on factors that organizations and managers have control over (i.e., strategy, unit design, human resource, leadership, climate/culture, and individual differences). We point out avenues for future research and conclude with practical implications. © 2015 The Authors. Journal of Organizational Behavior published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Citing Articles

Does Diversity Climate Matter? The More Respected I Feel, the Better I Can Do: Unravelling the Mechanisms Enabling Employees' Extra-Role Performance.

Ayele B, Wu W, Chen C Behav Sci (Basel). 2025; 14(12.

PMID: 39767305 PMC: 11672897. DOI: 10.3390/bs14121164.


The positive role of authentic leadership in organizations negatively affected by cognitive diversity.

Yagi K, Iida J, Fuji K Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1276585.

PMID: 38725954 PMC: 11079139. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1276585.


Perceived organizational values and innovation: The role of transactive memory and age diversity in military teams.

Odoardi C, Battistelli A, Velilla Guardela J, Antino M, Di Napoli G, Piccione L Mil Psychol. 2024; 33(5):296-307.

PMID: 38536259 PMC: 10013248. DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2021.1962177.


Bridging the gap: unleashing the power of non-core departments through interdepartmental collaboration.

Ren S, Wang Y Front Psychol. 2024; 14:1275666.

PMID: 38288363 PMC: 10823538. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1275666.


When and how is team cognitive diversity beneficial? An examination of Chaxu climate.

Qu J, Zhao S, Cao M, Lu J, Zhang Y, Chen Y Heliyon. 2024; 10(1):e23970.

PMID: 38268593 PMC: 10805916. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e23970.


References
1.
Chattopadhyay P, George E, Lawrence S . Why does dissimilarity matter? Exploring self-categorization, self-enhancement, and uncertainty reduction. J Appl Psychol. 2004; 89(5):892-900. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.892. View

2.
Homan A, Buengeler C, Eckhoff R, van Ginkel W, Voelpel S . The interplay of diversity training and diversity beliefs on team creativity in nationality diverse teams. J Appl Psychol. 2015; 100(5):1456-67. DOI: 10.1037/apl0000013. View

3.
van Knippenberg D, Schippers M . Work group diversity. Annu Rev Psychol. 2006; 58:515-41. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546. View

4.
van Knippenberg D, De Dreu C, Homan A . Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. J Appl Psychol. 2004; 89(6):1008-22. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008. View

5.
Schneider B, Ehrhart M, Macey W . Organizational climate and culture. Annu Rev Psychol. 2012; 64:361-88. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143809. View