» Articles » PMID: 28197655

Prefraction Displacement and Intrafraction Drift of the Prostate Due to Perineal Ultrasound Probe Pressure

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2017 Feb 16
PMID 28197655
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: In image-guided EBRT of the prostate, transperineal ultrasound (US) probes exert pressure on the perineum both during planning and treatment. Through tissue deformation and relaxation, this causes target and risk organ displacement and drift. In this study, prefraction shift and intrafraction drift of the prostate are quantified during robotic transperineal 4DUS.

Methods: The position of the prostate was recorded for different positions of the probe before treatment in 10 patients (16 series of measurements). During treatment (15 patients, 273 fractions), intrafraction motion of the prostate was tracked (total of 27 h and 24 min) with the transperineal probe in place.

Results: Per 1 mm shift of the US probe in the cranial direction, a displacement of the prostate by 0.42 ± 0.09 mm in the cranial direction was detected. The relationship was found to be linear (R² = 0.97) and highly significant (p < 0.0001). After initial contact of the probe and the perineum (no pressure), a shift of the probe of about 5-10 mm was typically necessary to achieve good image quality, corresponding to a shift of the prostate of about 2-4 mm in the cranial direction. Tissue compression and prostate displacement were well visible. During treatment, the prostate drifted at an average rate of 0.075 mm/min in the cranial direction (p = 0.0014).

Conclusion: The pressure applied by a perineal US probe has a quantitatively similar impact on prostate displacement as transabdominal pressure. Shifts are predominantly in the cranial direction (typically 2-4 mm) with some component in the anterior direction (typically <1 mm). Slight probe pressure can improve image quality, but excessive probe pressure can distort the surrounding anatomy and potentially move risk organs closer to the high-dose area.

Citing Articles

Physician reported toxicities and patient reported quality of life of transperineal ultrasound-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Ma J, Rogowski P, Trapp C, Manapov F, Xu B, Buchner A Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2024; 49:100868.

PMID: 39381629 PMC: 11459703. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100868.


Prostate intra-fraction motion recorded by transperineal ultrasound.

Ballhausen H, Belka C, Li M Sci Data. 2024; 11(1):504.

PMID: 38755158 PMC: 11099185. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-024-03365-2.


Impact of transperineal ultrasound on perineal skin dose in prostate radiation therapy.

De Silva K, Brown A, Edwards C Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2022; 23:27-32.

PMID: 36090010 PMC: 9460562. DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.08.003.


The ProMotion LMU dataset (2022 edition), prostate intra-fraction motion recorded by transperineal ultrasound.

Ballhausen H, Kortmann E, Belka C, Li M Sci Data. 2022; 9(1):455.

PMID: 35908072 PMC: 9338943. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01583-0.


Distance Between the Tumour and Nipple as a Predictor of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer.

Yang J, Yang Q, Mukherjee A, Lv Q Cancer Manag Res. 2021; 13:193-199.

PMID: 33469363 PMC: 7810584. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S262413.


References
1.
Treece G, Prager R, Gee A, Berman L . Correction of probe pressure artifacts in freehand 3D ultrasound. Med Image Anal. 2002; 6(3):199-214. DOI: 10.1016/s1361-8415(02)00080-4. View

2.
Treece G, Gee A, Prager R . RF and amplitude-based probe pressure correction for 3D ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005; 31(4):493-503. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.12.018. View

3.
Fargier-Voiron M, Presles B, Pommier P, Rit S, Munoz A, Liebgott H . Impact of probe pressure variability on prostate localization for ultrasound-based image-guided radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2014; 111(1):132-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.02.008. View

4.
Wang K, Vapiwala N, Deville C, Plastaras J, Scheuermann R, Lin H . A study to quantify the effectiveness of daily endorectal balloon for prostate intrafraction motion management. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 83(3):1055-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.07.038. View

5.
McGahan J, Ryu J, Fogata M . Ultrasound probe pressure as a source of error in prostate localization for external beam radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004; 60(3):788-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.005. View