» Articles » PMID: 28134319

A Comprehensive Analysis of the Germline and Expressed TCR Repertoire in White Peking Duck

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2017 Jan 31
PMID 28134319
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recently, many immune-related genes have been extensively studied in ducks, but relatively little is known about their TCR genes. Here, we determined the germline and expressed repertoire of TCR genes in White Peking duck. The genomic organization of the duck TCRα/δ, TCRγ and unconventional TCRδ2 loci are highly conserved with their counterparts in mammals or chickens. By contrast, the duck TCRβ locus is organized in an unusual pattern, (Vβ)-Dβ-(Jβ)-Cβ1-(Jβ)-Cβ2, which differs from the tandem-aligned clusters in mammals or the translocon organization in some teleosts. Excluding the first exon encoding the immunoglobulin domain, the subsequent exons of the two Cβ show significant diversity in nucleotide sequence and exon structure. Based on the nucleotide sequence identity, 49 Vα, 30 Vδ, 13 Vβ and 15 Vγ unique gene segments are classified into 3 Vα, 5 Vδ, 4 Vβ and 6 Vγ subgroups, respectively. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that most duck V subgroups, excluding Vβ1, Vγ5 and Vγ6, have closely related orthologues in chicken. The coding joints of all cDNA clones demonstrate conserved mechanisms that are used to increase junctional diversity. Collectively, these data provide insight into the evolution of TCRs in vertebrates and improve our understanding of the avian immune system.

Citing Articles

Macroevolution of avian T cell receptor C segments using genomic data.

Liang C, Sun L, Zhu Y, Zhao A, Liu H, He K Immunogenetics. 2023; 75(6):531-541.

PMID: 37804321 DOI: 10.1007/s00251-023-01322-8.


Repertoire analysis of γδ T cells in the chicken enables functional annotation of the genomic region revealing highly variable pan-tissue TCR gamma V gene usage as well as identifying public and private repertoires.

Dixon R, Preston S, Dascalu S, Flammer P, Fiddaman S, McLoughlin K BMC Genomics. 2021; 22(1):719.

PMID: 34610803 PMC: 8493715. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-021-08036-9.


Characterization of the chicken T cell receptor γ repertoire by high-throughput sequencing.

Zhang T, Li Q, Li X, Kang L, Jiang Y, Sun Y BMC Genomics. 2021; 22(1):683.

PMID: 34548028 PMC: 8456604. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-021-07975-7.


Characterization of the domestic goat γδ T cell receptor gene loci and gene usage.

Gillespie A, Yirsaw A, Gunasekaran K, Smith T, Bickhart D, Turley M Immunogenetics. 2021; 73(2):187-201.

PMID: 33479855 DOI: 10.1007/s00251-021-01203-y.


Evolution of the T-Cell Receptor (TR) Loci in the Adaptive Immune Response: The Tale of the TRG Locus in Mammals.

Antonacci R, Massari S, Linguiti G, Caputi Jambrenghi A, Giannico F, Lefranc M Genes (Basel). 2020; 11(6).

PMID: 32517024 PMC: 7349638. DOI: 10.3390/genes11060624.

References
1.
Nam B, Hirono I, Aoki T . The four TCR genes of teleost fish: the cDNA and genomic DNA analysis of Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) TCR alpha-, beta-, gamma-, and delta-chains. J Immunol. 2003; 170(6):3081-90. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.6.3081. View

2.
Meeker N, Smith A, Frazer J, Bradley D, Rudner L, Love C . Characterization of the zebrafish T cell receptor beta locus. Immunogenetics. 2010; 62(1):23-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00251-009-0407-6. View

3.
Moon D, Veniamin S, Parks-Dely J, Magor K . The MHC of the duck (Anas platyrhynchos) contains five differentially expressed class I genes. J Immunol. 2005; 175(10):6702-12. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.10.6702. View

4.
Criscitiello M, Ohta Y, Saltis M, McKinney E, Flajnik M . Evolutionarily conserved TCR binding sites, identification of T cells in primary lymphoid tissues, and surprising trans-rearrangements in nurse shark. J Immunol. 2010; 184(12):6950-60. PMC: 3222143. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902774. View

5.
Conrad M, Mawer M, Lefranc M, McKinnell L, Whitehead J, Davis S . The genomic sequence of the bovine T cell receptor gamma TRG loci and localization of the TRGC5 cassette. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2006; 115(3-4):346-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2006.10.019. View