» Articles » PMID: 28133415

Thriving on Challenge Stressors? Exploring Time Pressure and Learning Demands As Antecedents of Thriving at Work

Overview
Journal J Organ Behav
Date 2017 Jan 31
PMID 28133415
Citations 51
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the conceptualization of thriving at work, it is emphasized that employees' learning and vitality are two equally important components of thriving and that thriving is facilitated by contextual features and available resources. In this study, we examined the effects of two challenge stressors (time pressure and learning demands) on thriving at work. Based on the literature on challenge and hindrance stressors, we proposed that challenge stressors positively affect learning and negatively affect vitality. To uncover underlying mechanisms, we measured challenge appraisal and hindrance appraisal of work situations in a diary study. A sample of 124 knowledge workers responded to three daily surveys (before the lunch break, during the afternoon, and at the end of the workday) for a period of five workdays. Results indicate that the indirect effects of learning demands and time pressure on learning are mediated by challenge appraisal, whereas indirect effects of learning demands on vitality are mediated by hindrance appraisal. Overall, our study shows that challenge stressors have a positive total effect on learning but no total effect on vitality. These differential relationships call for a finer distinction between the two components of thriving at work in future research.

Citing Articles

Exploring the relationship between teachers' perceived workload, challenge-hindrance stress, and work engagement: a person-centered approach.

Wang H, Sun Y, Wang W, Liang H BMC Psychol. 2025; 13(1):201.

PMID: 40045400 PMC: 11881279. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-025-02537-y.


"Rat race" or "lying flat"? The influence of performance pressure on employees' work behavior.

Liao Q, Zhang J, Li F, Yang S, Li Z, Yue L Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1466463.

PMID: 39981390 PMC: 11841413. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1466463.


How could fit between polychronicity and multitasking shape employees' self-leadership? The moderating role of AI-empowered task processing.

Zhou Z, Xiang S, Xie Q Front Artif Intell. 2025; 8:1451944.

PMID: 39935675 PMC: 11811117. DOI: 10.3389/frai.2025.1451944.


Good stress or bad stress? An empirical study on the impact of time pressure on doctoral students' innovative behavior.

Zhang X, Zhao Z, Sun J, Ren J Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1460037.

PMID: 39582998 PMC: 11581851. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1460037.


The impact of perceived organizational support and human resources practices on innovative work behavior: does gender matter?.

Al-Taie M, Khattak M Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1401916.

PMID: 39006546 PMC: 11240868. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1401916.


References
1.
Ryan R, Deci E . On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001; 52:141-66. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141. View

2.
Baer M, Oldham G . The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. J Appl Psychol. 2006; 91(4):963-70. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.963. View

3.
Hockey G . Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload; a cognitive-energetical framework. Biol Psychol. 1997; 45(1-3):73-93. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0511(96)05223-4. View

4.
Podsakoff N, LePine J, LePine M . Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2007; 92(2):438-54. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.438. View

5.
Cavanaugh M, Boswell W, Roehling M, Boudreau J . An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers. J Appl Psychol. 2000; 85(1):65-74. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.65. View