» Articles » PMID: 28082195

The Influence of Calorie and Physical Activity Labelling on Snack and Beverage Choices

Overview
Journal Appetite
Date 2017 Jan 14
PMID 28082195
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Much research suggests nutrition labelling does not influence lower energy food choice. This study aimed to assess the impact of physical activity based and kilocalorie (Kcal) based labels on the energy content of snack food and beverage choices made.

Methods: An independent-groups design, utilizing an online questionnaire platform tested 458 UK adults (87 men), aged 18-64 years (mean: 30 years) whose BMI ranged from 16 to 41 kg/m (mean: 24 kg/m). Participants were randomized to one of four label information conditions (no label, Kcal label, physical activity label [duration of walking required to burn the Kcal in the product], Kcal and physical activity label) and were asked to choose from higher and lower energy options for a series of items.

Results: Label condition significantly affected low vs. high-energy product selection of snack foods (p < 0.001) and beverages (p < 0.001). The physical activity label condition resulted in significantly lower energy snack and beverage choices than the Kcal label condition (p < 0.001). This effect was found across the full sample and persisted even when participants' dietary restraint, BMI, gender, socioeconomic status, habitual physical activity, calorie and numerical literacy were controlled.

Conclusion: The provision of physical activity information appeared most effective in influencing the selection of lower Kcal snack food and beverage items, when compared with no information or Kcal information. These findings could inform the debate around potential legislative policies to facilitate healthier nutritional choices at a population level.

Citing Articles

Designing a new physical activity calorie equivalent food label and comparing its effect on caloric choices to that of the traffic light label among mothers: a mixed-method study.

Seyedhamzeh S, Nedjat S, Shakibazadeh E, Doustmohammadian A, Hosseini H, Kazemi A Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1280532.

PMID: 38035293 PMC: 10683755. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1280532.


Socioeconomic position and the effect of energy labelling on consumer behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Robinson E, Polden M, Langfield T, Clarke K, Calvert L, Colombet Z Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023; 20(1):10.

PMID: 36747247 PMC: 9903416. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-023-01418-0.


Is the effect of menu energy labelling on consumer behaviour equitable? A pooled analysis of twelve randomized control experiments.

Robinson E, Boyland E, Christiansen P, Haynos A, Jones A, Masic U Appetite. 2023; 182:106451.

PMID: 36610541 PMC: 10082393. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2023.106451.


Suggested explanations for the (in)effectiveness of nutrition information interventions among adults with a low socioeconomic status: a scoping review.

van Meurs T, Groeniger J, de Koster W, van der Waal J J Nutr Sci. 2022; 11:e50.

PMID: 35836699 PMC: 9241061. DOI: 10.1017/jns.2022.42.


The Negative Effects of Long Time Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent Labeling on Purchase Intention for Unhealthy Food.

Huang Y, Yang X, Chen Q Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(6).

PMID: 35329181 PMC: 8953109. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063463.