» Articles » PMID: 35329181

The Negative Effects of Long Time Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent Labeling on Purchase Intention for Unhealthy Food

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Mar 25
PMID 35329181
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

(1) Background: Obesity has become a global epidemic that arouse much attention from governments, companies and scholar. Physical activity calorie equivalent (PACE) labels are introduced as a more effective nudge invention on less-calorie ordering. However, the effects of PACE labels are controversial in previous literature, thus, the research objective is to explore the effects of different PACE labels and furtherly to explore the underlying psychological mechanism; (2) Methods: Across four scenario-based experiments, involving potato chips, chocolate and cookies, this study manipulated the three calorie-information labeling (standard calorie label, long time PACE and short time PACE labels). Meanwhile, the mediating mechanism of the effects involving anticipatory guilt and the moderation effects between consumers' future self-continuity and PACE labels are also measured; (3) Results: Results show that compared with the short time PACE and calorie labels, the longtime PACE labels have more negative influence on consumers' purchase intention for unhealthy food. What's more, the anticipatory guilt has negative effect of PACE labels as consumers are often prone to feeling guilty in the process of unhealthy food consumption. In addition, individuals with high future self-continuity have higher self-control and take more consideration of future outcomes, they are reluctant to choose unhealthy food than others; (4) Conclusions: Unhealthy food with a long time PACE label has more negative effect on consumers' purchase intention rather than a short time PACE label. At the same time, companies that produce healthy foods should actively participate in the movement to label calories through the PACE labels.

Citing Articles

The Negative Effects of Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent Labels on Consumers' Food Brand Evaluation.

Yang X, Hong M, Shi D, Chen Q Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(19).

PMID: 36231976 PMC: 9564542. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912676.

References
1.
Hersey J, Wohlgenant K, Arsenault J, Kosa K, Muth M . Effects of front-of-package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers. Nutr Rev. 2013; 71(1):1-14. DOI: 10.1111/nure.12000. View

2.
Shah M, Bouza B, Adams-Huet B, Jaffery M, Esposito P, Dart L . Effect of calorie or exercise labels on menus on calories and macronutrients ordered and calories from specific foods in Hispanic participants: a randomized study. J Investig Med. 2016; 64(8):1261-1268. DOI: 10.1136/jim-2016-000227. View

3.
Desmet P, Schifferstein H . Sources of positive and negative emotions in food experience. Appetite. 2007; 50(2-3):290-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2007.08.003. View

4.
Elder R, Mohr G . Guilty displeasures: How imagined guilt dampens consumer enjoyment. Appetite. 2020; 150:104641. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104641. View

5.
Viera A, Gizlice Z, Tuttle L, Olsson E, Gras-Najjar J, Hales D . Effect of calories-only vs physical activity calorie expenditure labeling on lunch calories purchased in worksite cafeterias. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(1):107. PMC: 6343240. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-6433-x. View