» Articles » PMID: 28069947

First-passage Time Approach to Controlling Noise in the Timing of Intracellular Events

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2017 Jan 11
PMID 28069947
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the noisy cellular environment, gene products are subject to inherent random fluctuations in copy numbers over time. How cells ensure precision in the timing of key intracellular events despite such stochasticity is an intriguing fundamental problem. We formulate event timing as a first-passage time problem, where an event is triggered when the level of a protein crosses a critical threshold for the first time. Analytical calculations are performed for the first-passage time distribution in stochastic models of gene expression. Derivation of these formulas motivates an interesting question: Is there an optimal feedback strategy to regulate the synthesis of a protein to ensure that an event will occur at a precise time, while minimizing deviations or noise about the mean? Counterintuitively, results show that for a stable long-lived protein, the optimal strategy is to express the protein at a constant rate without any feedback regulation, and any form of feedback (positive, negative, or any combination of them) will always amplify noise in event timing. In contrast, a positive feedback mechanism provides the highest precision in timing for an unstable protein. These theoretical results explain recent experimental observations of single-cell lysis times in bacteriophage [Formula: see text] Here, lysis of an infected bacterial cell is orchestrated by the expression and accumulation of a stable [Formula: see text] protein up to a threshold, and precision in timing is achieved via feedforward rather than feedback control. Our results have broad implications for diverse cellular processes that rely on precise temporal triggering of events.

Citing Articles

Microscopic origin of the spatial and temporal precision in biological systems.

Mondal A, Kolomeisky A Biophys Rep (N Y). 2025; 5(1):100197.

PMID: 39884433 PMC: 11867269. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpr.2025.100197.


Sequestration of gene products by decoys enhances precision in the timing of intracellular events.

Biswas K, Dey S, Singh A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):27199.

PMID: 39516495 PMC: 11549397. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75505-y.


Molecular mechanisms of precise timing in cell lysis.

Mondal A, Teimouri H, Kolomeisky A Biophys J. 2024; 123(18):3090-3099.

PMID: 38971973 PMC: 11427807. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2024.07.008.


A stochastic vs deterministic perspective on the timing of cellular events.

Ham L, Coomer M, Ocal K, Grima R, Stumpf M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):5286.

PMID: 38902228 PMC: 11190182. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-49624-z.


Mechanisms of cell size regulation in slow-growing Escherichia coli cells: discriminating models beyond the adder.

Nieto C, Vargas-Garcia C, Pedraza J, Singh A NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2024; 10(1):61.

PMID: 38811603 PMC: 11137094. DOI: 10.1038/s41540-024-00383-z.


References
1.
Raj A, van Oudenaarden A . Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences. Cell. 2008; 135(2):216-26. PMC: 3118044. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.050. View

2.
Singh A . Transient changes in intercellular protein variability identify sources of noise in gene expression. Biophys J. 2014; 107(9):2214-20. PMC: 4223191. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.09.017. View

3.
Voliotis M, Bowsher C . The magnitude and colour of noise in genetic negative feedback systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40(15):7084-95. PMC: 3424552. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks385. View

4.
Amir A, Kobiler O, Rokney A, Oppenheim A, Stavans J . Noise in timing and precision of gene activities in a genetic cascade. Mol Syst Biol. 2007; 3:71. PMC: 1828745. DOI: 10.1038/msb4100113. View

5.
Shao Y, Wang I . Bacteriophage adsorption rate and optimal lysis time. Genetics. 2008; 180(1):471-82. PMC: 2535697. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.090100. View